Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39342538›Full record

SynthesisSpine deformity2025

Segmental range-of-motion by vertebral level in fused and unfused patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review of the literature.

Omkar S Anaspure, Anthony N Baumann, Marc T Crawford, Pierce Davis, Laura C M Ndjonko, Jason B Anari, Keith D Baldwin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Omkar S AnaspurePerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Anthony N BaumannCollege of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.
Marc T CrawfordDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Pierce DavisPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-2411-9871
Laura C M NdjonkoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jason B AnariDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.
Keith D BaldwinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA. baldwink@chop.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to understand global and segmental spinal ROM in surgical and nonsurgical AIS patients.

methodsThis systematic review examined segmental vertebral ROM in AIS patients using PubMed, SPORTDiscus, MEDLINE, and Web of Science until October 8th, 2023. Inclusion criteria were articles on segmental motion in AIS patients, both operative and non-operative, under 18 years old.

resultsSeventeen articles met eligibility criteria from 2511 initially retrieved. All patients (n = 996) had AIS (549 non-operative; 447 were operative), with a frequency-weighted mean age of 15.1 ± 1.6 years and a baseline Cobb angle of 51.4 ± 13.3 degrees. Studies showed heterogenous segmental flexibility in the unfused spine, with the apical curve and upper thoracic segments being more rigid and lower segments more flexible at -5 disk segments from the apex. Most studies showed a predictable loss of motion in fused spinal regions postoperatively and a variable loss of global motion depending on the LIV and number of fused segments. A 7° global loss of total trunk flexion per level was observed with increasingly caudal LIV, starting at L1. Anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) preserved motion post-surgery but reduced coronal plane motion. AVBT saw less motion loss compared to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) but had higher revision and complication rates.

conclusionPreservation of spinal segments correlated with improved motion postoperatively. Increasing caudal LIV in PSF showed sagittal flexion loss. AVBT preserved more sagittal ROM than PSF but increased coronal motion loss, complications, and revision rates, with the largest benefit at LIV L4. Data on segmental motion are limited and further research on postoperative segmental ROM is required.

Indexed as

Range of Motion, ArticularScoliosisSpinal FusionAdolescentHumansLumbar VertebraeThoracic VertebraeAdolescent idiopathic scoliosisPediatric spineSegmental range-of-motionVertebral motion

Identifiers

PMID39342538
PMCPMC11729208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.