ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2024
Posterior Vitreous Detachment and Risk of Neovascular Glaucoma in Eyes with Prior Retinal Vascular Occlusions.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTo investigate the impact of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) on the risk of developing neovascular glaucoma (NVG) in eyes with occlusions of the retinal artery (RAO) or retinal vein (RVO).
methodsSingle-center retrospective case-control study of adults with a history of RVO/RAO. Cases (N = 101) who developed NVG were age and sex matched 1:2 to controls who did not develop NVG (N = 202). Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between history of PVD and risk of NVG while controlling for other related demographic or clinical factors.
resultsIn initial bivariate analyses, there was no difference in risk of NVG based on eye, lens status, hypertension, history of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), or retinal surgery (all p > 0.10), a borderline difference based on diabetic retinopathy (DR) (p = 0.06) and prior anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment (p = 0.08), and a significant difference based on race/ethnicity, type of vascular event, and PVD status (all p < 0.05). In the final multivariable model, patients without PVD were significantly more likely to develop NVG (OR = 3.07, p = 0.0001) independent of the other covariates. Risk of NVG was greater in those with DR (OR = 1.98, p = 0.0440) and in those with central RVO vs. branch RVO/hemiretinal RVO (OR = 5.77, p < 0.0001). Non-White/Non-Hispanics (OR = 2.56, p = 0.0051) and Hispanics (OR = 3.65, p = 0.0288) were more likely than White patients to develop NVG.
conclusionsProgression to NVG after retinal vascular occlusion is more likely in Non-White/Hispanic patients, those with concomitant DR, and those with CRVO/CRAO. The absence of PVD increases the risk for NVG. Further studies are necessary to understand this relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.