Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39342522›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

A multibody simulation of the spine for objectification of biomechanical quantities after VBT: a proof of concept and description of baseline data.

Jil Frank, Miguel Pishnamaz, Dominika Ignasiak, Per David Trobisch, Frank Hildebrand, Maximilian Praster

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Does screw alignment affect tether breakage in vertebral body tethering?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jil FrankDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. jil.frank@rwth-aachen.de.ORCID 0009-0004-9370-5786
Miguel PishnamazDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Dominika IgnasiakInstitute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8557-0245
Per David TrobischDepartment of Spine Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany.
Frank HildebrandDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Maximilian PrasterTeaching and Research Area Experimental Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6346-0253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVertebral Body Tethering (VBT), an alternative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, shows satisfactory post-operative results. However, the biomechanical quantities and consequences after VBT surgery remain largely unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the spinal biomechanics during different motions using a multibody simulation approach.

methodsThe tether and intervertebral compression forces were simulated in a validated spine model during different physiological movements at different pre-tensions and screw positions, while considering the anatomical muscle and ligament properties.

resultsThe simulations showed that an augmentation of the pre-tension and an alteration of the screw position have both significant impact on the intervertebral compression and tether forces. The forces also vary depending on the movement performed, with the highest tether forces measured during lateral bending. In the upright position, with a pre-tension of 200 N, the maximum compression force increases by up to 157% compared to the untethered maximum compression force. The screw position can lead to large differences in the distribution of forces in the spine.

conclusionThe biomechanical data provide a first impression of the forces that occur along the spine during various physiological movements and are consistent with published clinical data. Forces are not evenly distributed along the spine, with higher lumbar forces. The tether forces reach values during lateral bending that can potentially destroy the tether´s integrity and thus may explain the common post-operative complication, namely tether breakage. The results of the model can therefore have an impact on future directions for improved surgical VBT treatment.

Indexed as

ScoliosisAdolescentBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationHumansProof of Concept StudySpinal FusionSpineVertebral BodyAdolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)Compression forceMultibody simulationTether forceVertebral body tethering (VBT)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.