ArticleDiscover oncology2024
AI-powered genomic mutation signature for predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy outcomes in gastroesophageal cancer: a multi-cohort analysis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence networks for assessing the prognosis of gastrointestinal cancer to immunotherapy based on genetic mutation features: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- cGAS-STING Pathway in Gastrointestinal Malignancies: Mechanistic Insights and Translational Therapeutic Opportunities.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning-driven advancements in gastrointestinal cancer: Paving the way for precision medicine.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-enabled multi-omics biomarkers for immune checkpoint blockade: mechanisms, predictive modeling, and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly transformed the treatment of gastroesophageal cancer (GEC). However, the lack of reliable prognostic biomarkers hinders the ability to predict patient response to ICI therapy.
methodsIn this study, we engineered and validated a genomic mutation signature (GMS) utilizing an innovative artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to forecast ICI therapy outcomes in GEC patients. We further explored immune profiles across subtypes through comprehensive multiomics analysis. Our investigation of drug sensitivity data from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database led to the identification of trametinib as a potential therapeutic agent. We subsequently evaluated trametinib's efficacy in AGS and MKN45 cell lines using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) assays and clonogenic experiments.
resultsWe developed a GMS by integrating 297 algorithms, enabling autonomous prognosis prediction for GEC patients. The GMS demonstrated consistent performance across three public cohorts, exhibiting high sensitivity and specificity for overall survival (OS) at 6, 12, and 18 months, as shown by Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (ROC) analysis. Notably, the GMS surpassed traditional clinical and molecular features, including tumor mutational burden (TMB), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and microsatellite instability (MSI), in predictive accuracy. Low-risk samples exhibited elevated levels of cytolytic immune cells and heightened immunogenic potential compared to high-risk samples. Our investigation identified trametinib as a potential therapeutic agent. An inverse correlation was observed between GMS and trametinib IC50. Moreover, the high-risk-derived AGS cell line showed increased sensitivity to trametinib compared to the low-risk-derived MKN45 cell line.
conclusionThe GMS utilized in this study successfully demonstrated the ability to reliably predict the survival advantage for patients with GECs undergoing ICI therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.