ArticleArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2025
Concurrent Validity of Performance-Based Measures of Daily Functioning with Cognitive Measures and Informant Reported Everyday Functioning.
Article in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDespite the substantial need for reliable and valid assessment of functional ability in older adults, there is currently limited research on the emergence of early functional declines during prodromal dementia stages, such as subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This study uses novel performance-based assessments to characterize subtle, yet clinically meaningful, changes in functional ability.
methodA sample of 93 older adults classified as cognitively unimpaired (CU; n = 30, Mage = 73.57 ± 6.66), SCD (n = 34, Mage = 72.56 ± 6.43), or MCI (n = 29, Mage = 78.28 ± 7.55) underwent neuropsychological testing along with an informant-rated daily functional skills measure (Assessment of Functional Capacity Interview). Participants also completed the Night Out Task (NOT), an open-ended performance-based measure of functional assessment, and the Financial Capacity Instrument-Short Form (FCI-SF) that assesses financial skills.
resultsThe MCI group performed worse on the NOT and FCI-SF relative to SCD and CU. NOT and FCI scores were associated with measures of global cognitive function, executive function, processing speed, language and memory, and FCI-SF overall score was correlated with informant-rated functional ability. The NOT and FCI-SF were also predictive of informant-reported daily functioning over and above traditional cognitive data and demographics.
conclusionsPerformance-based measures of IADL may allow for earlier detection of subtle functional changes that might not be adequately captured by traditional measures. The measurement of early functional changes is an important global outcome to evaluate the efficacy of interventions in dementia research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.