Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39342443›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2024

Error monitoring under working memory load: An electrocortical investigation.

Brandon K Watanabe, Elizabeth A Bauer, Annmarie MacNamara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brandon K WatanabeDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Elizabeth A BauerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5521-7712
Annmarie MacNamaraDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0399-973X

Funding

HARM-A: A neurobiological predictor of comorbidity and stress reactivity in anxiety disordersR01MH125083 · NIMH · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI MACNAMARA, ANNMARIE EILEEN · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
Training in Learning and MemoryT32MH106454 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PRESTON, ALISON R · 2015 to 2025
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125083NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH106454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Error monitoring is essential for detecting errors and may facilitate behavioral adjustments that can reduce or prevent future errors. At times, error monitoring must occur while individuals are engaged in other, cognitively demanding tasks that might consume processing resources necessary for error monitoring. Here, we set out to determine whether concurrent working memory (WM) load interferes with error monitoring, as measured using event-related potentials, the error-related negativity (Ne/ERN), and error positivity (Pe). Fifty-four participants (n = 33 female) completed an arrowhead flanker task, with trials presented under low (2 letter) or high (6 letter) WM load. Participants were required to hold letter strings in memory and to recall these letters at the end of a set of flanker trials. Results showed that WM load reduced the Pe but did not affect the Ne/ERN. Therefore, WM load appeared to attenuate later, more elaborated stages of error processing, though initial error detection was unaffected. Additionally, high WM load slowed reaction times overall, but did not lead to a significant increase in errors. As such, slower responses may have helped participants maintain comparable accuracy for low-load versus high-load trials. Overall, results indicate that WM load interferes with the evaluation of error significance, which could interfere with behavioral adaptations over time.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsMemory, Short-TermPsychomotor PerformanceAdolescentAdultCerebral CortexExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung Adultcognitive loadconflict monitoringerror monitoringerror positivity (Pe)error‐related negativity (Ne/ERN)event‐related potential (ERP)

Identifiers

PMID39342443
PMCPMC11698382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.