ArticleJournal of medical case reports2024
Interfering antibodies may contribute to elevated D-dimer: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlasma levels of D-dimer are elevated in patients with thromboembolisms. Here we investigated the existence of interfering antibodies as a potential cause for elevated D-dimer levels. CASE PRESENTATION: A 42-year-old white Caucasian woman with a prior history of pulmonary embolism during her first pregnancy (treated with heparin therapy for 6 weeks postnatally) and hypothyroidism had a persistent elevated D-dimer without any clinical or ultrasound-based signs of thromboembolic conditions during her second pregnancy. We obtained informed consent and plasma was obtained from the patient. D-dimer levels were measured using two different assays. We also tested for the presence of rheumatoid factor, performed dilution series, and finally used an antibody depletion strategy. The two D-dimer assays performed similarly. Using our antibody depletion technique, we observed that ~ 1/3 of the increased plasma levels of D-dimer may be attributed to interfering antibodies.
conclusionsOur results identify interfering antibodies as a potential contributor to an increased D-dimer in this patient. Our case highlights the potential of heterophilic interference for increased D-dimer and provides a procedure to determine this analytically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.