ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2024
Coronary artery calcium score and other risk factors in patients at moderate and high risk of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity.
Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostics in cardio-oncology: a focus on anthracyclines.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Research Priorities and Future Directions in Cardio-Oncology.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Radiation-Induced Cardiac Remodeling: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2025Review
- Calcium scoring during 18F-FDG PET/CT in cancer indications: Improving cardiovascular risk stratification and prevention.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe presence and burden of coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a strong predictor of cardiovascular events. Current guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) for cardio-oncology do not recommend the use of the CAC score to determine the status of risk in cancer patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the presence and burden of CAC on cardiac tomography and the distribution of the cardiovascular toxicity risk factors in patients with moderate and high baseline risk of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity.
methodsThe study prospectively included cancer patients, diagnosed and qualified for systemic treatment with anthracycline chemotherapy. Clinical data and blood samples were collected from all patients. Additionally, the echocardiography and coronary computed tomography (CCTA) with the calculation of the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score were performed.
resultsA total of 80 patients (mean age 60.5 years, 75 female) were included in the study. The majority of patients (62, 77.5%) had breast cancer, 11 (13.8%) were diagnosed with sarcoma, and 7 (8.8%) with lymphoma. There were 42 (52.5%) patients classified as having moderate (MR) and 38 (47.5%) as having high risk (HR) of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity according to current ESC guidelines. In comparison with moderate risk, high risk patients were older and more likely to have hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and chronic kidney disease. The mean coronary artery calcium score was significantly higher in the HR group (150.4 vs. 24.8; p = 0.000). Furthermore, cardiac biomarkers were also higher in high-risk patients (p = 0.000). In echocardiographic parameters global longitudinal strain (GLS) was lower (p = 0.012), and diastolic dysfunction was more common in the HR group. However, the left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) was similar in the MR and HR groups.
conclusionsIn patients at high and moderate risk for cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity, cardiovascular toxicity risk factors were common and more prevalent in the high-risk group. The coronary artery calcium score was also significantly higher in the high-risk group. Assessing the presence and burden of coronary artery calcium is an attractive option to assess additional cardiovascular risk in cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.