ArticleBMC chemistry2024
Magnetic graphene oxide nanosheets with amidoamine dendronized crosslinks for dual pH and redox-sensitive doxorubicin delivery.
Article in BMC chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Graphene oxide-modified PEEK composites: Properties and applications in orthopaedic repair - A review.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delivering anticancer drugs to the appropriate site within the body poses a critical challenge in cancer treatment with chemotherapeutic agents like doxorubicin (DOX). Magnetic graphene oxide (GO) nanosheets with generation 1 (G1) amidoamine-dendronized crosslinks were developed by coupling cystamine-functionalized GO nanosheets with Fe3O4 nanoparticles modified with primary amine and methyl acrylate. These magnetic GO nanosheets were loaded with DOX to create a dual pH- and redox-responsive delivery system for cancer chemotherapy. The prepared magnetic nanosheets underwent characterization using FTIR, XRD, DLS, VSM, FE-SEM, and TEM. Physical DOX adsorption was evaluated using various isotherms, including Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Dubinin-Radushkevich. The in-vitro release profiles of DOX from the magnetic nanosheets were studied under different pH conditions, with and without glutathione (GSH), and the drug release data were fitted with various kinetic models. Additionally, an MTT assay was employed to assess the compatibility and antitumor activity of DOX-loaded magnetic nanosheets in the HepG2 cell line. The results showed that the maximum drug loading was 13.1% (w/w) at a drug/carrier ratio of 1. Without GSH addition, the maximum drug release after 10 days was only 17.9% and 24.1% at pH 7.4 and 5.3, respectively. However, in the presence of GSH, the maximum drug release reached 51.7% and 64.8% at pH 7.4 and 5.3, respectively. Finally, the research findings suggest that the magnetic nanosheets exhibited pH- and redox-stimuli drug release, high biocompatibility, and superior antitumor activity compared to free DOX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.