Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39342334›Full record

Trial reportHead & face medicine2024

Changes in soft tissue dimensions following horizontal guided bone regeneration with a split-thickness flap design - evaluation of 8 cases with a digital method.

Kristof Somodi, Andrea Dobos, Ferenc Bartha, Eleonora Solyom, Peter Windisch, Daniel Palkovics, Balint Molnar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Head & face medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05538715 (Comperative Clinical, Microcircular, Surface Scanning, Radiological and Histological Evaluation of Two Different Flap Techniques - A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial/), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05538715 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Comperative Clinical, Microcircular, Surface Scanning, Radiological and Histological Evaluation of Two Different Flap Techniques - A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial/

TypeinterventionalSponsorSemmelweis UniversityRan2019 to 2024Enrolled44ConditionsPartial-edentulismArmsSplit-thickness group, Full-thickness group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristof SomodiDepartment of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, Budapest, 1088, Hungary. somodi.kristof@semmelweis.hu.
Andrea DobosDepartment of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, Budapest, 1088, Hungary.
Ferenc BarthaDepartment of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, Budapest, 1088, Hungary.
Eleonora SolyomDepartment of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, Budapest, 1088, Hungary.
Peter WindischDepartment of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, Budapest, 1088, Hungary.
Daniel Palkovics *Department of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, Budapest, 1088, Hungary.
Balint Molnar *Department of Periodontology, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Street 47, Budapest, 1088, Hungary.

Funding

Ministry of Innovation and Technology, Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office FK_OTKA 2020 135348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeri-implant soft tissue corrections are often indicated following alveolar ridge augmentation, due to the distortion of the keratinized mucosa at the area of augmentation. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the dimensional soft tissue changes following horizontal guided bone regeneration (GBR) utilizing 3D digital data.

methods8 mandibular surgical sites with horizontal alveolar ridge deficiencies were treated utilizing a resorbable collagen membrane and a split-thickness flap design. Baseline and 6-month follow-up cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were reconstructed as 3D virtual models and were superimposed with the corresponding intraoral scan. Linear changes of supracrestal vertical- horizontal soft tissue alterations were measured in relation to the alveolar crest at the mesial- middle- and distal aspect of the surgical area. Soft tissue dimensions were measured at baseline and at 6-month follow-up.

resultsPreoperative supracrestal soft tissue height measured midcrestally averaged at 2.37 mm ± 0.68 mm, 2.37 mm ± 0.71 mm and 2.64 mm ± 0.87 mm at the mesial-, middle- and distal planes. Whereas postoperative supracrestal soft tissue height was measured at 2.62 mm ± 0.72 mm, 2.67 mm ± 0.67 mm and 3.69 mm ± 1.02 mm at the mesial, middle and distal planes, respectively. Supracrestal soft tissue width changed from 2.14 mm ± 0.72 mm to 2.47 mm ± 0.46 mm at the mesial, from 1.72 mm ± 0.44 mm to 2.07 mm ± 0.67 mm and from 2.15 mm ± 0.36 mm to 2.36 mm ± 0.59 mm at the mesial, middle and distal planes, respectively. Additionally the buccal horizontal displacement of supracrestal soft tissues could be observed.

conclusionsThe current study did not report significant supracrestal soft tissue reduction following horizontal GBR with a split-thickness flap. Even though there was a slight increase in both vertical and horizontal dimensions, differences are clinically negligible. TRAIL REGISTRATION: The trail was approved by the U.S. National Library of Medicine ( www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ); trial registration number: NCT05538715; registration date: 09/09/2022.

Indexed as

Alveolar Ridge AugmentationCone-Beam Computed TomographySurgical FlapsAdultAgedBone RegenerationFemaleGuided Tissue Regeneration, PeriodontalHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMandibleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeCBCT analysisHorizontal ridge augmentationIntraoral scanSoft tissue alterationsSplit-thickness flap

Identifiers

PMID39342334
PMCPMC11438005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.