Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39342328›Full record

ArticleBiological research2024

Identification and functional characteristics of CHD1L gene variants implicated in human Müllerian duct anomalies.

Shuya Chen, Yali Fan, Yujun Sun, Shenghui Li, Zhi Zheng, Chunfang Chu, Lin Li, Chenghong Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CHD1L in cancer and beyond: structure, oncogenic functions, and therapeutic potential.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shuya ChenCentral Laboratory, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, 17 QiHeLou Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100006, China.
Yali FanCentral Laboratory, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, 17 QiHeLou Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100006, China.
Yujun SunCentral Laboratory, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, 17 QiHeLou Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100006, China.
Shenghui LiDepartment of Gynecology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, 251 YaoJiaYuan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100026, China.
Zhi ZhengCentral Laboratory, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, 17 QiHeLou Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100006, China.
Chunfang ChuDepartment of Gynecology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, 251 YaoJiaYuan Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100026, China. chuchunfang@ccmu.edu.cn.
Lin LiCentral Laboratory, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, 17 QiHeLou Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100006, China. linlithu@ccmu.edu.cn.
Chenghong YinCentral Laboratory, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, 17 QiHeLou Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100006, China. yinchh@ccmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2503-3285

Funding

Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University. Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital FCYY202011Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University. Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital FCYYJC202406Outstanding Young Talents Program of the Capital Medical University B2205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMüllerian duct anomalies (MDAs) are congenital developmental disorders that present as a series of abnormalities within the reproductive tracts of females. Genetic factors are linked to MDAs and recent advancements in whole-exome sequencing (WES) provide innovative perspectives in this field. However, relevant mechanism has only been investigated in a restricted manner without clear elucidation of respective observations.

methodsOur previous study reported that 2 of 12 patients with MDAs harbored the CHD1L variant c.348-1G>C. Subsequently, an additional 85 MDAs patients were recruited. Variants in CHD1L were screened through the in-house database of WES performed in the cohort and two cases were identified. One presented with partial septate uterus with left renal agenesis and the other with complete septate uterus, duplicated cervices and longitudinal vaginal septum. The pathogenicity of the discovered variants was further assessed by molecular dynamics simulation and various functional assays.

resultsUltimately, two novel heterozygous CHD1L variants, including a missense variant c.956G>A (p.R319Q) and a nonsense variant c.1831C>T (p.R611*) were observed. The variants were absent in 100 controls. Altogether, the contribution yield of CHD1L to MDAs was calculated as 4.12% (4/97). All three variants were assessed as pathogenic through various functional analysis. The splice-site variant c.348-1G>C resulted in a 11 bp sequence skipping in exon 4 of CHD1L and led to nonsense mediated decay of its transcripts. Unlike WT CHD1L, the truncated R611* protein mislocalized to the cytoplasm, abolish the ability of CHD1L to promote cell migration and failed to interact with PARP1 owing to the loss of macro domain. The R319Q variant exhibited conformational disparities and showed abnormal protein recruitment behavior through laser microirradiation comparing with the WT CHD1L. All these variants impaired the CHD1L function in DNA damage repair, thus participating in MDAs.

conclusionsThe current study not only expands the mutational spectrum of CHD1L in MDAs but determines three variants as pathogenic according to ACMG guidelines with reliable functional evidence. Additionally, the impairment in DNA damage repair is an underlying mechanism involved in MDAs.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesMullerian DuctsExome SequencingFemaleHumansMutationMutation, MissenseCHD1 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesCHD1LFunctional assessmentGenetic etiologyMüllerian duct anomalyWhole exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39342328
PMCPMC11437902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.