ArticleMolecular cancer2024
CD16+ as predictive marker for early relapse in aggressive B-NHL/DLBCL patients.
Article in Molecular cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasmacytic markers as immunotherapeutic targets for primary CD20-negative aggressive B-cell lymphomas.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- E2F Accelerates the Proliferation of B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas by Upregulating Cell-Cycle Genes.Current medical science · 2026Article
- Impact of Perforin 1 A91V germ line background in patients with aggressive B-NHL treated with R-CHOP.Blood advances · 2026Article
- "Monocytes in B-Cell Malignancies: Their Role in Disease Progression and Therapy Resistance".Current oncology reports · 2025Review
- Single-cell RNA sequencing in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: tumor heterogeneity, microenvironment, resistance, and prognostic markers.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Prognostic value of lymphocyte subsets in diffuse large B cell lymphoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessing the prognosis of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma mainly relies on a clinical risk score (IPI). Standard first-line therapies are based on a chemo-immunotherapy with rituximab, which mediates CD16-dependent antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). We phenotypically and functionally analyzed blood samples from 46 patients focusing on CD16+ NK cells, CD16+ T cells and CD16+ monocytes. Kaplan-Meier survival curves show a superior progression-free survival (PFS) for patients having more than 1.6% CD16+ T cells (p = 0.02; HR = 0.13 (0.007-0.67)) but an inferior PFS having more than 10.0% CD16+ monocytes (p = 0.0003; HR = 16.0 (3.1-291.9)) at diagnosis. Surprisingly, no correlation with NK cells was found. The increased risk of relapse in the presence of > 10.0% CD16+ monocytes is reversed by the simultaneous occurrence of > 1.6% CD16+ T cells. The unexpectedly strong protective function of CD16+ T cells could be explained by their high antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity as quantified by real-time killing assays and single-cell imaging. The combined analysis of CD16+ monocytes (> 10%) and CD16+ T cells (< 1.6%) provided a strong model with a Harrell's C index of 0.80 and a very strong power of 0.996 even with our sample size of 46 patients. CD16 assessment in the initial blood analysis is thus a precise marker for early relapse prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.