ArticlePlant methods2024
An efficient multiplex approach to CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in citrus.
Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A RUBY-Based Visual Hairy Root Transformation and CRISPR-Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Targeted multiplex gene knockouts in Lemna minor using CRISPR/Cas9.Transgenic research · 2026Article
- TONSOKU prevents the formation of large tandem duplications and restrains ATR-WEE1 checkpoint activation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Root-Specific Signal Modules Mediating Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Fruit Crops.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Enhancement of Fungal Disease Resistance in Major Staple Crops Using CRISPR-Cas Technology.Genes · 2025Review
- Development of Protoplast-Based Gene Editing System for Areca Palm.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing requires high efficiency to be routinely implemented, especially in species which are laborious and slow to transform. This requirement intensifies further when targeting multiple genes simultaneously, which is required for genetic screening or more complex genome engineering. Species in the Citrus genus fall into this category. Here we describe a series of experiments with the collective aim of improving multiplex gene editing in the Carrizo citrange cultivar using tRNA-based sgRNA arrays. We evaluate a range of promoters for their efficacy in such experiments and achieve significant improvements by optimizing the expression of both the Cas9 endonuclease and the sgRNA array. In the case of the former we find the UBQ10 or RPS5a promoters from Arabidopsis driving the zCas9i endonuclease variant useful for achieving high levels of editing. The choice of promoter expressing the sgRNA array also had a large impact on gene editing efficiency across multiple targets. In this respect Pol III promoters perform especially well, but we also demonstrate that the UBQ10 and ES8Z promoters from Arabidopsis are robust alternatives. Ultimately, this study provides a quantitative insight into CRISPR/Cas9 vector design that has practical application in the simultaneous editing of multiple genes in Citrus, and potentially other eudicot plant species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.