ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Dual stage MRI image restoration based on blind spot denoising and hybrid attention.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimization of the Non-Local Means Algorithm for Breast Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using a 3D-Printed Breast-Mimicking Phantom.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is extensively utilized in clinical diagnostics and medical research, yet the imaging process is often compromised by noise interference. This noise arises from various sources, leading to a reduction in image quality and subsequently hindering the accurate interpretation of image details by clinicians. Traditional denoising methods typically assume that noise follows a Gaussian distribution, thereby neglecting the more complex noise types present in MRI images, such as Rician noise. As a result, denoising remains a challenging and practical task.
methodThe main research work of this paper focuses on modifying mask information based on a global mask mapper. The mask mapper samples all blind spot pixels on the denoised image and maps them to the same channel. By incorporating perceptual loss, it utilizes all available information to improve performance while avoiding identity mapping. During the denoising process, the model may mistakenly remove some useful information as noise, resulting in a loss of detail in the denoised image. To address this issue, we train a generative adversarial network (GAN) with adaptive hybrid attention to restore the detailed information in the denoised MRI images.
resultThe two-stage model NRAE shows an improvement of nearly 1.4 dB in PSNR and approximately 0.1 in SSIM on clinical datasets compared to other classic models. Specifically, compared to the baseline model, PSNR is increased by about 0.6 dB, and SSIM is only 0.015 lower. From a visual perspective, NRAE more effectively restores the details in the images, resulting in richer and clearer representation of image details.
conclusionWe have developed a deep learning-based two-stage model to address noise issues in medical MRI images. This method not only successfully reduces noise signals but also effectively restores anatomical details. The current results indicate that this is a promising approach. In future work, we plan to replace the current denoising network with more advanced models to further enhance performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.