Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39342219›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2024

Evaluating waterlogging stress response and recovery in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): an image-based phenotyping approach.

Patrick Langan, Emilie Cavel, Joey Henchy, Villő Bernád, Paul Ruel, Katie O'Dea, Keshawa Yatagampitiya, Hervé Demailly, Laurent Gutierrez, Sónia Negrão

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Patrick LanganSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1518-1580
Emilie CavelCentre de Ressources Régionales en Biologie Moléculaire, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4807-1372
Joey HenchySchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5878-1757
Villő BernádSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1800-6924
Paul RuelCentre de Ressources Régionales en Biologie Moléculaire, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
Katie O'DeaSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Keshawa YatagampitiyaSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Hervé DemaillyCentre de Ressources Régionales en Biologie Moléculaire, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
Laurent GutierrezCentre de Ressources Régionales en Biologie Moléculaire, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
Sónia NegrãoSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. sonia.negrao@ucd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8059-5240

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland 18/FRL/6197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waterlogging is expected to become a more prominent yield restricting stress for barley as rainfall frequency is increasing in many regions due to climate change. The duration of waterlogging events in the field is highly variable throughout the season, and this variation is also observed in experimental waterlogging studies. Such variety of protocols make intricate physiological responses challenging to assess and quantify. To assess barley waterlogging tolerance in controlled conditions, we present an optimal duration and setup of simulated waterlogging stress using image-based phenotyping. Six protocols durations, 5, 10, and 14 days of stress with and without seven days of recovery, were tested. To quantify the physiological effects of waterlogging on growth and greenness, we used top down and side view RGB (Red-Green-Blue) images. These images were taken daily throughout each of the protocols using the PSI PlantScreen™ imaging platform. Two genotypes of two-row spring barley, grown in glasshouse conditions, were subjected to each of the six protocols, with stress being imposed at the three-leaf stage. Shoot biomass and root imaging data were analysed to determine the optimal stress protocol duration, as well as to quantify the growth and morphometric changes of barley in response to waterlogging stress. Our time-series results show a significant growth reduction and alteration of greenness, allowing us to determine an optimal protocol duration of 14 days of stress and seven days of recovery for controlled conditions. Moreover, to confirm the reproducibility of this protocol, we conducted the same experiment in a different facility equipped with RGB and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging sensors. Our results demonstrate that the selected protocol enables the assessment of genotypic differences, which allow us to further determine tolerance responses in a glasshouse environment. Altogether, this work presents a new and reproducible image-based protocol to assess early stage waterlogging tolerance, empowering a precise quantification of waterlogging stress relevant markers such as greenness, Fv/Fm and growth rates.

Indexed as

BarleyChlorophyll fluorescenceHigh-throughput phenotypingPlant imaging. Fv/FmWaterlogging

Identifiers

PMID39342219
PMCPMC11438059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.