Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39342140›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2024

Community structure of soil microorganisms and endophytes of honeysuckle at different ecological niche specificities.

Qingyi Xu, Dan Jiang, Na Zhou, Yingquan Kang, Meng Li, Chuchu Yang, Xinyu Liu, Jiu Mi, Guodong Hua, Guangxi Ren and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterization of defensome genes and mobile genetic Elements in different types of pasture soil agroecosystems from the Brazilian Amazon.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Qingyi XuBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Dan JiangBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Na ZhouBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yingquan KangBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Meng LiBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Chuchu YangBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xinyu LiuBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jiu MiUniversity of Tibetan Medicine, Lasa, China.
Guodong HuaBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Guangxi RenBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China. renguangxiabc@163.com.
Chunsheng LiuBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China. max_liucs@263.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe plant microbiome is one of the key determinants of healthy plant growth. However, the complexity of microbial diversity in plant microenvironments in different regions, especially the relationship between subsurface and aboveground microorganisms, is not fully understood. The present study investigated the diversity of soil microorganisms in different regions and the diversity of microorganisms within different ecological niches, and compared soil microorganisms and endophytic microorganisms.

methods16 S and ITS sequencing was used to sequence the soil and endophytes microbiome of honeysuckle. Alpha diversity analysis and principal component analysis (PCoA) were used to study the soil and endophyte microbial communities, and the function of endophyte bacteria and fungi was predicted based on the PICRUST2 process and FUNGuild.

resultsIn total, there were 382 common bacterial genera and 139 common fungal genera in the soil of different producing areas of honeysuckle. There were 398 common bacterial genera and 157 common fungal genera in rhizosphere soil. More beneficial bacteria were enriched in rhizosphere soil. Endophytic bacteria were classified into 34 phyla and 770 genera. Endophytic fungi were classified into 11 phyla and 581 genera, among which there were significant differences in the dominant genera of roots, stems, leaves, and flowers, as well as in community diversity and richness. Endophytic fungal functions were mainly dominated by genes related to saprophytes, functional genes that could fight microorganisms were also found in KEGG secondary functional genes.

conclusionMore beneficial bacteria were enriched in rhizosphere soil of honeysuckle, and the microbial network of the rhizosphere is more complex than that of the soil. Among the tissues of honeysuckle, the flowers have the richest diversity of endophytes. The endogenous dominant core bacteria in each part of honeysuckle plant have a high degree of overlap with the dominant bacteria in soil. Functional prediction suggested that some dominant core bacteria have antibacterial effects, providing a reference for further exploring the strains with antibacterial function of honeysuckle. Understanding the interaction between honeysuckle and microorganisms lays a foundation for the study of growth promotion, quality improvement, and disease and pests control of honeysuckle from the perspective of microorganisms.

Indexed as

BacteriaEndophytesFungiLoniceraMicrobiotaRhizosphereSoil MicrobiologyBiodiversityPhylogenyPlant RootsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilEndophytic bacteriaFunction predictionHigh-throughput sequencingHoneysuckleRhizosphere soil

Identifiers

PMID39342140
PMCPMC11438390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.