Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39342115›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2024

Investigating the link between temperamental and motor development: a longitudinal study of infants aged 6-42 months.

Atsuko Nakagawa, Taishi Miyachi, Makiko Tomida, Taro Matsuki, Satoshi Sumi, Masayuki Imaeda, Akio Nakai, Takeshi Ebara, Michihiro Kamijima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Atsuko NakagawaGraduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nagoya City University, 1 Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Yamanohata, Mizuho-Cho, 467-8501, Japan. nakagawa@hum.nagoya-cu.ac.jp.
Taishi MiyachiNagoya Western Care Center for Disabled Children, Nagoya, Japan.
Makiko TomidaGraduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nagoya City University, 1 Mizuho-Ku, Nagoya, Yamanohata, Mizuho-Cho, 467-8501, Japan.
Taro MatsukiDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Wellness Sciences, Hiroshima International University, Higashi-hiroshima, Japan.
Satoshi SumiFaculty of Nursing, Kinjo Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan.
Masayuki ImaedaNorthern Regional Children Rehabilitation Center Yotsuba, Nagoya, Japan.
Akio NakaiResearch Institute for Education & Graduate School of Clinical Education, Mukogawa Women's University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Takeshi EbaraDepartment of Ergonomics, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health , Kitakyushu-Shi, Japan.
Michihiro KamijimaDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the 1920s, motor development has been a strong research theme, focusing on infants' acquisition of motor skills, such as turning over and crawling. In the 1980s, a dynamic systems approach began emphasizing children's own motivation, which helped explain individual differences in the emergence of motor skills. However, few studies have examined factors contributing to individual differences in early motor development. In response, we investigated directional associations between temperament and motor development in children aged 6 months to 3 years.

methodThe Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS-A) recruited mothers between January 2011 and March 2014. 2,639 mothers were sent a questionnaire at 6 months, and responses were received from 1,657 of them, with full data for children aged 6 months, 2 years, and 3 years, including from three mothers of twins, were analyzed through structural equation modeling. Question items regarding fine and gross motor activities at each age were selected by pediatric neurologists specializing in developmental disorders. The Japanese version of the Little Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire was administered at 42 months. Temperament was assessed through the parent-reported Behavior Questionnaire (short version) for infants, toddlers, and children. In all three measures, Surgency and Negative Affectivity were extracted, and Effortful Control, a major form of self-regulation, was found from toddlerhood onward, as in previous studies.

resultsA path diagram reveals that at 6 months, Surgency and Orienting/Regulation interacted positively with the motor function (respectively, r = .57; r = 40, ps < .001). Up to about 3 years, Effortful Control plays a role in facilitating the motor function, resulting in positive effects on Control During Movement (CDM), General Coordination (GC), and Fine Motor Movement (FMM) (β = 14; β = 30; β = 37, ps < .001). Surgency had a positive effect on CDM and GC (β = 18; β = 06, ps < .001), whereas Negative Affect had a negative influence on FMM and GC (β = -.08; β = -.08, ps < .001).

conclusionWhile Surgency may be a key reactive factor in early motor development, Effortful Control and Movement develop in an interactive manner.

trial registrationUMIN000030786. Scientific Title: The Japan Environment and Children's Study. Date of disclosure of the study: 2018/01/15. Only questionnaires were administered in the study.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentMotor SkillsTemperamentChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantJapanLongitudinal StudiesMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesCoordinated movementInfantLongitudinal studyTemperamentToddler

Identifiers

PMID39342115
PMCPMC11437715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.