ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024
Early onset neonatal sepsis and its associatited factors: a cross sectional study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maternal and neonatal determinants of newborn sepsis: A case-control study in resource-limited settings.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Article
- Review
- Membrane Status and Reliability of Intrapartum Transperineal Ultrasound in Cervical Dilatation Assessment.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is the 3rd leading cause of neonatal mortality in Ethiopia contributing to 16% of neonatal death. In a hospital study, neonatal sepsis was the leading diagnosis at admission and the second leading cause of neonatal death at the neonatal intensive care unit. Among other factors repeated vaginal examination during labor is known to contribute to sepsis in low-income settings. However, there is limited evidence in the Ethiopian setting.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the association between early-onset neonatal sepsis and repeated vaginal examinations.
methodsThe study was conducted at Gandhi Memorial Hospital, a public maternity and newborn care hospital. We followed 672 mother-newborn pairs by phone until 7 days of age to detect clinical sepsis. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 software. Adjusted odds ratio risk (AOR) with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to show the strength of associations and variables with p-value < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
resultsThe incidence of early-onset neonatal sepsis was found to be 20.83% (95% CI 17.60, 24.00). Having a frequent vaginal examination (four or more times) during labor and delivery, prolonged rupture of membranes, induced labor and gestational age < 37 weeks were strongly associated with the development of early-onset neonatal sepsis, (AOR 2. 69;95 CI: 1.08, 6.70) AOR 5.12(95% CI 1.31, 20.00), AOR of 5.24 (95% CI 1.72, AOR4.34 (95% CI 1.20, 15.68), 16.00), respectively.
conclusionFrequent digital vaginal examination prolonged rupture of membranes, induced labor and gestational age < 37 weeks significantly increases the risk of early onset neonatal sepsis. We also recommend further study using neonatal blood culture to better diagnose early onset neonatal sepsis objectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.