Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2024
Microbiological profiles and clinical outcomes of critically ill surgical patients with lower gastrointestinal perforation in Japan: a single-center retrospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLower gastrointestinal perforation (LGP) is a surgical emergency disease that can result in secondary bacterial peritonitis. Microbiological studies on LGP are rare. The present study aimed to ascertain the microbiological profile of LGP in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at our institute after surgery. In addition, we investigated whether initial empirical therapy with vancomycin was associated with in-hospital mortality, duration of ICU stay, and duration of ventilator support.
methodsThis single-center, retrospective, observational study was conducted at Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Japan. The study population included all patients diagnosed with LGP who were admitted to the ICU after emergency surgery between 2017 and 2023. The primary outcome assessed was the microbiological profile of microorganisms isolated from ascites fluid and blood of the participants. The secondary end-points were in-hospital mortality, duration of ICU stay, and duration of ventilator support. We performed univariate and multivariate regression analyses to evaluate the end-points.
resultsDuring the study period, 89 patients were included in the analysis. The most commonly identified pathogen from the ascites cultures was Escherichia coli (65.2%), followed by Enterococcus spp. (51.7%). E. faecium was identified in 16 (18.0%) ascites samples. The microbiological profile of critically ill patients with LGP admitted to the ICU after surgery was similar to that of previous studies on intra-abdominal infection (IAI). Therefore, the initial empirical therapy in the IAI guidelines is more appropriate for LGP. Multivariate regression analysis suggested that the combination of initial empirical therapy with vancomycin was not associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-3.00, p = 0.955), duration of ICU stay (coefficient=-0.92, 95% CI -3.04-1.21, p = 0.393), or duration of ventilator-support (coefficient=-9.03, 95%CI -49.69-31.63, p = 0.659).
conclusionThe microbiological profile of critically ill patients with LGP admitted to the ICU after surgery was similar to that of previous studies on IAI. However, the frequency of E. faecium in the present study was higher than that in previous studies. Initial empirical therapy with drugs such as meropenem in combination with vancomycin for E. faecium was not associated with in-hospital mortality, duration of ICU stay, and duration of ventilator support, after adjusting for confounding factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.