ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2025
Prediction of short-term adverse clinical outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism using conventional machine learning and deep Learning based on CTPA images.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic potential of radiomics evaluation of lung artery thrombus for pulmonary embolism patients.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Use of Radiomics to Predict Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism: A Scoping Review of an Unresolved Clinical Challenge.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The promise and limitations of artificial intelligence in CTPA-based pulmonary embolism detection.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To explore the predictive value of traditional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms based on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) images for short-term adverse outcomes in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE). This retrospective study enrolled 132 patients with APE confirmed by CTPA. Thrombus segmentation and texture feature extraction was performed using 3D-Slicer software. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was used for feature dimensionality reduction and selection, with optimal λ values determined using leave-one-fold cross-validation to identify texture features with non-zero coefficients. ML models (logistic regression, random forest, decision tree, support vector machine) and DL models (ResNet 50 and Vgg 19) were used to construct the prediction models. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC). The cohort included 84 patients in the good prognosis group and 48 patients in the poor prognosis group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that diabetes, RV/LV ≥ 1.0, and Qanadli index form independent risk factors predicting poor prognosis in patients with APE(P < 0.05). A total of 750 texture features were extracted, with 4 key features identified through screening. There was a weak positive correlation between texture features and clinical parameters. ROC curves analysis demonstrated AUC values of 0.85 (0.78-0.92), 0.76 (0.67-0.84), and 0.89 (0.83-0.95) for the clinical, texture feature, and combined models, respectively. In the ML models, the random forest model achieved the highest AUC (0.85), and the support vector machine model achieved the lowest AUC (0.62). And the AUCs for the DL models (ResNet 50 and Vgg 19) were 0.91 (95%CI: 0.90-0.92) and 0.94(95%CI: 0.93-0.95), respectively. Vgg 19 model demonstrated exceptional precision (0.93), recall (0.76), specificity (0.95) and F1 score (0.84). Both ML and DL models based on thrombus texture features from CTPA images demonstrated higher predictive efficacy for short-term adverse outcomes in patients with APE, especially the random forest and Vgg 19 models, potentially assisting clinical management in timely interventions to improve patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39342072What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.