ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2024
Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Common Bile Duct Dilation: A Real Breakthrough.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultrasound of Bile Ducts-An Update on Measurements, Reference Values, and Their Influencing Factors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is important for the evaluation of patients with common bile duct (CBD) dilation.
aimsThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of EUS for CBD dilation in patients with negative initial studies.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study that included patients who underwent EUS for CBD dilation (≥ 7 mm if intact anatomy or ≥ 10 mm if prior cholecystectomy) in the absence of pathology on previous ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and/or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).
resultsA total of 109 patients were included, among whom 41 had a positive EUS: 33 choledocholithiasis (30.3%), 6 chronic pancreatitis (5.5%), and 2 ampullary cancer (1.8%). If the EUS was negative, no pathology was found during 1-year follow-up. Older age was associated with positive EUS (79 versus 71 years, p = 0.030). Patients with jaundice, cholelithiasis, and altered liver biochemistry were 16.2 (p = 0.002), 3.1 (p = 0.024), and 2.9 (p = 0.009) times more likely to have positive EUS, respectively. A total of 53 patients had a negative MRCP (48.6%); those with biliary abdominal pain and jaundice were 15.5 (p < 0.001) and 20.0 (p = 0.007) times more likely to have positive EUS, respectively. Considering asymptomatic patients with normal liver tests, CBD diameter ≥ 10 mm in US and ≥ 11 mm in CT can predict a positive EUS (AUC 0.754, p = 0.047 and AUC 0.734, p = 0.048).
conclusionsEUS is a useful diagnostic method for patients with unexplained CBD dilation, even if negative MRCP, and especially in patients with older age, abdominal pain, jaundice, cholelithiasis, and/or altered liver biochemistry. CBD diameter in US and CT had a moderate discriminative ability in predicting positive EUS in asymptomatic patients without altered liver biochemistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39342067What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.