ArticleScientific reports2024
Enhanced gastric cancer classification and quantification interpretable framework using digital histopathology images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI for IMPACTS Framework for Evaluating the Long-Term Real-World Impacts of AI-Powered Clinician Tools: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Reinforcement learning-driven adaptive game therapy for cognitive impairment patients with improved vision transformer based detection model.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- [Research on deep learning-based pathological image classification of pilonidal sinus].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Article
- Health behavior risk prediction in metabolic syndrome patients: development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model via multisource heterogeneous data integration.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Tumor Tissue Detection in Stomach Cancer: A Retrospective Algorithm Development and Validation Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Multi-institutional validation of AI models for classifying urothelial neoplasms in digital pathology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Application of deep learning models in gastric cancer pathology image analysis: a systematic scoping review.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- The Use of Selected Machine Learning Methods in Dairy Cattle Farming: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Optimized breast cancer diagnosis using self-adaptive quantum metaheuristic feature selection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An interpretable framework for gastric cancer classification using multi-channel attention mechanisms and transfer learning approach on histopathology images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-convolutional neural networks for cotton disease detection using synergistic deep learning paradigm.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent developments have highlighted the critical role that computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems play in analyzing whole-slide digital histopathology images for detecting gastric cancer (GC). We present a novel framework for gastric histology classification and segmentation (GHCS) that offers modest yet meaningful improvements over existing CAD models for GC classification and segmentation. Our methodology achieves marginal improvements over conventional deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) models by adaptively focusing on pertinent characteristics of images. This contributes significantly to our study, highlighting that the proposed model, which performs well on normalized images, is robust in certain respects, particularly in handling variability and generalizing to different datasets. We anticipate that this robustness will lead to better results across various datasets. An expectation-maximizing Naïve Bayes classifier that uses an updated Gaussian Mixture Model is at the heart of the suggested GHCS framework. The effectiveness of our classifier is demonstrated by experimental validation on two publicly available datasets, which produced exceptional classification accuracies of 98.87% and 97.28% on validation sets and 98.47% and 97.31% on test sets. Our framework shows a slight but consistent improvement over previously existing techniques in gastric histopathology image classification tasks, as demonstrated by comparative analysis. This may be attributed to its ability to capture critical features of gastric histopathology images better. Furthermore, using an improved Fuzzy c-means method, our study produces good results in GC histopathology picture segmentation, outperforming state-of-the-art segmentation models with a Dice coefficient of 65.21% and a Jaccard index of 60.24%. The model's interpretability is complemented by Grad-CAM visualizations, which help understand the decision-making process and increase the model's trustworthiness for end-users, especially clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.