Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39342030›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Enhanced gastric cancer classification and quantification interpretable framework using digital histopathology images.

Muhammad Zubair, Muhammad Owais, Tahir Mahmood, Saeed Iqbal, Syed Muhammad Usman, Irfan Hussain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Research on deep learning-based pathological image classification of pilonidal sinus].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad ZubairFaculty of Information Technology & Computer Science, University of Central Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad OwaisKhalifa University Center for Autonomous Robotic Systems (KUCARS) and Department of Mechanical & Nuclear Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. muhammad.owais@ku.ac.ae.
Tahir MahmoodDivision of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea.
Saeed IqbalFaculty of Information Technology & Computer Science, University of Central Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Syed Muhammad UsmanDepartment of Computer Science, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Bahria University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Irfan HussainKhalifa University Center for Autonomous Robotic Systems (KUCARS) and Department of Mechanical & Nuclear Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

Khalifa University, United Arab Emirates 8474000409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent developments have highlighted the critical role that computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems play in analyzing whole-slide digital histopathology images for detecting gastric cancer (GC). We present a novel framework for gastric histology classification and segmentation (GHCS) that offers modest yet meaningful improvements over existing CAD models for GC classification and segmentation. Our methodology achieves marginal improvements over conventional deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) models by adaptively focusing on pertinent characteristics of images. This contributes significantly to our study, highlighting that the proposed model, which performs well on normalized images, is robust in certain respects, particularly in handling variability and generalizing to different datasets. We anticipate that this robustness will lead to better results across various datasets. An expectation-maximizing Naïve Bayes classifier that uses an updated Gaussian Mixture Model is at the heart of the suggested GHCS framework. The effectiveness of our classifier is demonstrated by experimental validation on two publicly available datasets, which produced exceptional classification accuracies of 98.87% and 97.28% on validation sets and 98.47% and 97.31% on test sets. Our framework shows a slight but consistent improvement over previously existing techniques in gastric histopathology image classification tasks, as demonstrated by comparative analysis. This may be attributed to its ability to capture critical features of gastric histopathology images better. Furthermore, using an improved Fuzzy c-means method, our study produces good results in GC histopathology picture segmentation, outperforming state-of-the-art segmentation models with a Dice coefficient of 65.21% and a Jaccard index of 60.24%. The model's interpretability is complemented by Grad-CAM visualizations, which help understand the decision-making process and increase the model's trustworthiness for end-users, especially clinicians.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedStomach NeoplasmsAlgorithmsBayes TheoremDeep LearningHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID39342030
PMCPMC11439054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.