ArticleScientific reports2024
HemoFuse: multi-feature fusion based on multi-head cross-attention for identification of hemolytic peptides.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MAPLE: interpretable deep learning identifies selective antimicrobial peptides using joint evolutionary-physicochemical analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Harnessing Machine Learning Approaches for the Identification, Characterization, and Optimization of Novel Antimicrobial Peptides.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hemolytic peptides are therapeutic peptides that damage red blood cells. However, therapeutic peptides used in medical treatment must exhibit low toxicity to red blood cells to achieve the desired therapeutic effect. Therefore, accurate prediction of the hemolytic activity of therapeutic peptides is essential for the development of peptide therapies. In this study, a multi-feature cross-fusion model, HemoFuse, for hemolytic peptide identification is proposed. The feature vectors of peptide sequences are transformed by word embedding technique and four hand-crafted feature extraction methods. We apply multi-head cross-attention mechanism to hemolytic peptide identification for the first time. It captures the interaction between word embedding features and hand-crafted features by calculating the attention of all positions in them, so that multiple features can be deeply fused. Moreover, we visualize the features obtained by this module to enhance its interpretability. On the comprehensive integrated dataset, HemoFuse achieves ideal results, with ACC, SP, SN, MCC, F1, AUC, and AP of 0.7575, 0.8814, 0.5793, 0.4909, 0.6620, 0.8387, and 0.7118, respectively. Compared with HemoDL proposed by Yang et al., it is 3.32%, 3.89%, 5.93%, 10.6%, 8.17%, 5.88%, and 2.72% higher. Other ablation experiments also prove that our model is reasonable and efficient. The codes and datasets are accessible at https://github.com/z11code/Hemo .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.