ArticleScientific reports2024
Improved genetic algorithm for multi-threshold optimization in digital pathology image segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Tumor Treatment Through Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Modeling: A Comprehensive Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
- A Multi-Strategy Improved Seagull Optimization Algorithm for Global Optimization and Artistic Image Segmentation.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multi-Threshold Image Segmentation Based on the Hybrid Strategy Improved Dingo Optimization Algorithm.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable prediction model using spatial patterns of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in H&E-stained whole-slide images for immune subtyping of lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- A multi-level thresholding image segmentation algorithm based on equilibrium optimizer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents an improved genetic algorithm focused on multi-threshold optimization for image segmentation in digital pathology. By innovatively enhancing the selection mechanism and crossover operation, the limitations of traditional genetic algorithms are effectively addressed, significantly improving both segmentation accuracy and computational efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate that the improved genetic algorithm achieves the best balance between precision and recall within the threshold range of 0.02 to 0.05, and it significantly outperforms traditional methods in terms of segmentation performance. Segmentation quality is quantified using metrics such as precision, recall, and F1 score, and statistical tests confirm the superior performance of the algorithm, especially in its global search capabilities for complex optimization problems. Although the algorithm's computation time is relatively long, its notable advantages in segmentation quality, particularly in handling high-precision segmentation tasks for complex images, are highly pronounced. The experiments also show that the algorithm exhibits strong robustness and stability, maintaining reliable performance under different initial conditions. Compared to general segmentation models, this algorithm demonstrates significant advantages in specialized tasks, such as pathology image segmentation, especially in resource-constrained environments. Therefore, this improved genetic algorithm offers an efficient and precise multi-threshold optimization solution for image segmentation, providing valuable reference for practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.