ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2025
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is a standard treatment option for patients with malignant pulmonary masses (including primary and metastatic lesions) who are unfit for surgery or who are medically operable but refuse surgery. Flourine-18 flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (
objectivesThe aim of this retrospective study is to assess the value of baseline metabolic volumetric parameters as prognostic imaging biomarkers in patients with pulmonary masses/nodules treated with SABR.
methods70 patients were included in this retrospective study (39 male and 31 female, age range 47-91 years, mean 76 years). Standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, MTV and TLG for all the patients were calculated on baseline
resultsThere was no significant statistical difference in the SUVmax and SUVmean in all the three categories. Mean SUVmax ranges from 7.13 to 8.08 with its highest value in the stable disease and lowest value in the progressive disease categories. Similarly, the average SUVmean was 4.9 in the free of disease category and 4.68 in the progressive disease category. MTV and TLG were low in the free of disease and the highest in progressive disease. MTV increased from 2.25 cm
conclusionsTLG and MTV are more useful than SUVmax and SUVmean for predicting outcome, OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving SABR. The TLG and MTV measurement on
Indexed as
Identifiers
39341996What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.