Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39341991›Full record

ArticleOncogene2024

Insight into mammary gland development and tumor progression in an E2F5 conditional knockout mouse model.

Briana To, Carson Broeker, Jing-Ru Jhan, Jesus Garcia-Lerena, John Vusich, Rachel Rempel, Jonathan P Rennhack, Daniel Hollern, Lauren Jackson, David Judah and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Briana ToDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Carson BroekerDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3621-2884
Jing-Ru JhanDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Jesus Garcia-LerenaDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
John VusichDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Rachel RempelDuke University, Durham, USA.
Jonathan P RennhackDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Daniel HollernThe Salk Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.
Lauren JacksonDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
David JudahDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Matt SwiatnickiDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Evan BylettDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Rachel KubiakDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Jordan HoneysettDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Joseph NevinsDuke University, Durham, USA.
Eran AndrechekDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. Andrech1@msu.edu.

Funding

Transcriptional regulation of mammary gland developmentR01HD104606 · NICHD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Eran Robert Andrechek · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD104606U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) 1R01HD104606-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of breast cancer is linked to altered regulation of mammary gland developmental processes. A better understanding of normal mammary gland development can thus reveal possible mechanisms of how normal cells are re-programmed to become malignant. E2Fs 1-4 are part of the E2F transcription factor family with varied roles in mammary development, but little is known about the role of E2F5. A combination of scRNAseq and predictive signature tools demonstrated the presence of E2F5 in the mammary gland and showed changes in predicted activity during the various phases of mammary gland development. Testing the hypothesis that E2F5 regulates mammary function, we generated a mammary-specific E2F5 knockout mouse model, resulting in modest mammary gland development changes. However, after a prolonged latency the E2F5 conditional knockout mice developed highly metastatic mammary tumors. Whole genome sequencing revealed significant intertumor heterogeneity. RNAseq and protein analysis identified altered levels of Cyclin D1, with similarities to MMTV-Neu tumors, suggesting that E2F5 conditional knockout mammary glands and tumors may be dependent on Cyclin D1. Transplantation of the tumors revealed metastases to lymph nodes that were enriched through serial transplantation in immune competent recipients. Based on these findings, we propose that loss of E2F5 leads to altered regulation of Cyclin D1, which facilitates the development of metastatic mammary tumors after long latency. More importantly, this study demonstrates that conditional loss of E2F5 in the mammary gland leads to tumor formation, revealing its role as a transcription factor regulating a network of genes that normally result in a tumor suppressor function.

Indexed as

E2F5 Transcription FactorMammary Glands, AnimalMice, KnockoutAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMiceE2F5 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID39341991
PMCPMC11554565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.