ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025
Chromosome segregation of human nonhomologous Robertsonian translocations: insights from preimplantation genetic testing.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful pregnancy after preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements in a couple with complex chromosome rearrangement and recurrent spontaneous abortion: a case report.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Impact of Chromosomal Structural Rearrangements on IVF Laboratory Outcomes in PGT-SR Cycles: A Propensity Score Matching-Based Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The clinical application and challenges of preimplantation genetic testing.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robertsonian translocations (robs) are associated with a high risk for unbalanced segregations. Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) offers an early opportunity to evaluate segregation patterns and selection against chromosome imbalances. The objective of this study was to evaluate the chromosome complements in blastocysts for male and female rob carriers and provide information useful in PGT counseling for rob carriers. PGT results were reviewed for 296 couples where a balanced and nonhomologous rob was present in one member of the couple. All embryos had day 5/6 trophectoderm biopsy and SNP-based PGT. The study included 2235 blastocysts, of which 2151 (96.2%) had results. Significantly fewer blastocysts were available for female rob carriers (mean 4.60/IVF cycle) compared to males (5.49/cycle). Male carriers were more likely to have blastocysts with a normal/balanced chromosome complement; 84.8% versus 62.8% (P < 0.00001). Male carriers had fewer blastocysts with monosomy (60/152, 39.5%) compared to female carriers (218/396, 55.1%) (P = 0.001). Twenty-one (1%) blastocysts showed 3:0 segregation; these were mostly double trisomies and derived from female carriers. Differences between chromosome complements for male versus female carriers suggest that selection against unbalanced forms may occur during spermatogenesis. Six blastocyst samples showed an unexpected ("noncanonical") combination of trisomy and monosomy. One case of uniparental disomy was identified. For female carriers, there was no association between unbalanced segregation and parental age but for male carriers, there was an inverse association. PGT is a highly beneficial option for rob carriers and patients can be counseled using our estimates for the chance of at least one normal/balanced embryo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.