Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39341956›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

UICE-MIRNet guided image enhancement for underwater object detection.

Pratima Sarkar, Sourav De, Sandeep Gurung, Prasenjit Dey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pratima SarkarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Technology, Sikkim Manipal University, Rangpo, Sikkim, 737136, India. psmoon2@gmail.com.
Sourav DeDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Cooch Behar Government Engineering College, Cooch Behar, 736170, India.
Sandeep GurungDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sikkim Manipal Institute of Technology, Sikkim Manipal University, Rangpo, Sikkim, 737136, India.
Prasenjit DeyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, NIT Rourkela, Rourkela, 769008, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Underwater object detection is a crucial aspect of monitoring the aquaculture resources to preserve the marine ecosystem. In most cases, Low-light and scattered lighting conditions create challenges for computer vision-based underwater object detection. To address these issues, low-colorfulness and low-light image enhancement techniques are explored. This work proposes an underwater image enhancement technique called Underwater Image Colorfulness Enhancement MIRNet (UICE-MIRNet) to increase the visibility of small, multiple, dense objects followed by underwater object detection using YOLOv4. UICE-MIRNet is a specialized version of classical MIRNet, which handles random increments of brightness features to address the visibility problem. The proposed UICE-MIRNET restrict brightness and also works on the improvement of the colourfulness of underwater images. UICE-MIRNet consists of an Underwater Image-Colorfulness Enhancement Block (UI-CEB). This block enables the extraction of low-colourful areas from underwater images and performs colour correction without affecting contextual information. The primary characteristics of UICE-MIRNet are the extraction of multiple features using a convolutional stream, feature fusion to facilitate the flow of information, preservation of contextual information by discarding irrelevant features and increasing colourfulness through proper feature selection. Enhanced images are then trained using the YOLOv4 object detection model. The performance of the proposed UICE-MIRNet method is quantitatively evaluated using standard metrics such as UIQM, UCIQE, entropy, and PSNR. The proposed work is compared with many existing image enhancement and restoration techniques. Also, the performance of object detection is assessed using precision, recall, and mAP. Extensive experiments are conducted on two standard datasets, Brackish and Trash-ICRA19, to demonstrate the performance of the proposed work compared to existing methods. The results show that the proposed model outperforms many state-of-the-art techniques.

Indexed as

Computer VisionDeep Neural NetworkMIRNetObject DetectionUnderwater Image EnhancementYOLOv4

Identifiers

PMID39341956
PMCPMC11439071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.