ArticleScientific reports2024
Precision patient selection for improved detection of circulating genetically abnormal cells in pulmonary nodules.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Harmonizing definitions in liquid biopsy: A terminology framework by the international society of liquid biopsy.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circulating genetically abnormal cells (CACs) have emerged as a promising biomarker for the early diagnosis of lung cancer, particularly in patients with pulmonary nodules. However, their performance may be suboptimal in certain patient populations. This study aimed to refine patient selection to improve the detection of CACs in pulmonary nodules. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 241 patients with pulmonary nodules who had undergone pathological diagnosis through surgical tissue specimens. Utilizing consensus clustering analysis, the patients were categorized into three distinct clusters. Cluster 1 was characterized by older age, larger nodule size, and a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes. Notably, the diagnostic efficacy of CACs in Cluster 1 surpassed that of the overall patient population (AUC: 0.855 vs. 0.689, P = 0.044). Moreover, for Cluster 1, an integrated diagnostic model was developed, incorporating CACs, sex, maximum nodule type, and maximum nodule size, resulting in a further improved AUC of 0.925 (95% CI 0.846-1.000). In conclusion, our study demonstrates that CACs detection shows better diagnostic performance in aiding the differentiation between benign and malignant nodules in older patients with larger pulmonary nodules and comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension. Further research and validation are needed to explore how to better integrate CACs detection into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.