ArticleScientific reports2024
Optimal parameter identification of solid oxide fuel cell using modified fire Hawk algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Value Patents Recognition with Random Forest and Enhanced Fire Hawk Optimization Algorithm.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Robust recursive estimation for the errors-in-variables nonlinear systems with impulsive noise.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An accurate and efficient approach is required to identify the unknown parameters of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) mathematical model for a robust design of any energy system considering SOFC. This research study proposes a modified fire hawk algorithm (MFHA) to determine the values of SOFC model parameters. The performance evaluation of MFHA is tested on two case studies. Firstly, the performance of MFHA is tested on commercially available cylindrical cell developed by Siemens at four temperatures. Results reveal that the least value of sum of squared error (SSE) is 1.04E-05, 2.30E-05, 1.03E-05, and 1.60E-05 at 1073 K, 1173 K, 1213 K, and 1273 K respectively. Results obtained using MFHA have been compared with original fire hawk algorithm (FHA) and other well established and recent algorithms. Secondly, MFHA is implemented for estimating unknown parameters of a 5 kW dynamic tabular stack of 96 cells at various pressures and temperatures. The obtained value of SSE at different temperatures of 873 K, 923 K, 973 K, 1023 K and 1073 K is 1.18E-03, 6.12E-03, 2.21E-02, 5.18E-02, and 6.00E-02, respectively whereas, SSE at different pressures of 1 atm, 2 atm, 3 atm, 4 atm, and 5 atm is 6.05E-02, 6.11E-02, 5.53E-02, 5.11E-02, and 6.64E-02 respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.