Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39341867›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

New results in stereopsis and Listing's law.

Jacek Turski

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ab Initio Binocular Formulation of Listing's Law.Journal of eye movement research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jacek TurskiProfessor Emeritus, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Houston-Downtown, One Main Street, Houston, TX, 77002, USA. turskij@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7968-3980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human eyes' optical components are misaligned. This study presents comprehensive geometric constructions in the binocular system, with the eye model incorporating the fovea that is displaced from the posterior pole and the lens that is tilted away from the eye's optical axis. It extends their previously considered horizontal misalignment with the vertical components. When the eyes' binocular posture changes, 3D spatial coordinates of the retinal disparity (iso-disparity curves), the subjective vertical horopter, and the eye's torsional orientation transformations are visualized in GeoGebra's simulations. The consequences and functional roles of vertical misalignment of the eye's optical components are explained in the following findings: (1) The classic Helmholtz theory, which states that the subjective vertical retinal meridian inclination to the retinal horizon explains the backward tilt of the perceived vertical horopter, is less relevant when the eye's optical components are misaligned. Instead, the lens vertical tilt provides the retinal vertical criterion that explains the experimentally measured vertical horopter inclination. (2) Listing's law, which originally restricts single-eye torsional positions and has imprecise binocular extensions, is formulated for binocular fixations using Euler's rotation theorem. It, however, replaces Listing's plane, which is defined for eyes looking at infinity, with the eyes muscles' natural tonus resting position corresponding to the abathic distance fixation of empirical straight frontal horopter. This new meaning of Listing's plane provides neurophysiological significance that has remained elusive.

Indexed as

Depth PerceptionVision, BinocularHumansRetinaVision DisparityAsymmetric retinal correspondenceGeoGebra’s dynamic geometryHorizontal, vertical, and torsional disparitiesIso-disparity conic sectionsListing’s LawStereopsisThe asymmetric eyeVertical horopters

Identifiers

PMID39341867
PMCPMC11438877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.