ArticleScientific reports2024
Identification of candidate causal variants and target genes at 41 breast cancer risk loci through differential allelic expression analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Neurogenetic disorders associated with mutations in the FERRY complex: a novel disease class?Biology open · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding breast cancer genetic risk relies on identifying causal variants and candidate target genes in risk loci identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS), which remains challenging. Since most loci fall in active gene regulatory regions, we developed a novel approach facilitated by pinpointing the variants with greater regulatory potential in the disease's tissue of origin. Through genome-wide differential allelic expression (DAE) analysis, using microarray data from 64 normal breast tissue samples, we mapped the variants associated with DAE (daeQTLs). Then, we intersected these with GWAS data to reveal candidate risk regulatory variants and analysed their cis-acting regulatory potential. Finally, we validated our approach by extensive functional analysis of the 5q14.1 breast cancer risk locus. We observed widespread gene expression regulation by cis-acting variants in breast tissue, with 65% of coding and noncoding expressed genes displaying DAE (daeGenes). We identified over 54 K daeQTLs for 6761 (26%) daeGenes, including 385 daeGenes harbouring variants previously associated with BC risk. We found 1431 daeQTLs mapped to 93 different loci in strong linkage disequilibrium with risk-associated variants (risk-daeQTLs), suggesting a link between risk-causing variants and cis-regulation. There were 122 risk-daeQTL with stronger cis-acting potential in active regulatory regions with protein binding evidence. These variants mapped to 41 risk loci, of which 29 had no previous report of target genes and were candidates for regulating the expression levels of 65 genes. As validation, we identified and functionally characterised five candidate causal variants at the 5q14.1 risk locus targeting the ATG10 and ATP6AP1L genes, likely acting via modulation of alternative transcription and transcription factor binding. Our study demonstrates the power of DAE analysis and daeQTL mapping to identify causal regulatory variants and target genes at breast cancer risk loci, including those with complex regulatory landscapes. It additionally provides a genome-wide resource of variants associated with DAE for future functional studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.