Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39341847›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

A randomized feasibility trial of time-restricted eating during pregnancy in people with increased risk of gestational diabetes.

Hanna M S Skarstad, Kamilla L Haganes, Md Abu Jafar Sujan, Trine M Gellein, Mariell K Johansen, Kjell Å Salvesen, John A Hawley, Trine Moholdt

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hanna M S SkarstadDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Kamilla L HaganesDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Md Abu Jafar SujanDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Trine M GelleinDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Mariell K JohansenDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Kjell Å SalvesenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Olav's hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
John A HawleyExercise and Nutrition Research Programme, Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Trine MoholdtDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. trine.moholdt@ntnu.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time-restricted eating (TRE) is a nutritional intervention that confines the daily time-window for energy intake. TRE reduces fasting glucose concentrations in non-pregnant individuals, but whether this eating protocol is feasible and effective for glycemic control in pregnancy is unknown. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate the adherence to and effect of a 5-week TRE intervention (maximum 10 h daily eating window) among pregnant individuals at risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), compared with a usual-care control group. Participants underwent 2-h oral glucose tolerance tests and estimation of body composition, before and after the intervention. Interstitial glucose levels were continuously measured, and adherence rates and ratings of hunger were recorded daily. Thirty of 32 participants completed the trial. Participants allocated to TRE reduced their daily eating window from 12.3 (SD 1.3) to 9.9 (SD 1.0) h, but TRE did not affect glycemic measures, blood pressure, or body composition, compared with the control group. TRE increased hunger levels in the evening, but not in the morning, and induced only small changes in dietary intake. Adhering to a 5-week TRE intervention was feasible for pregnant individuals with increased risk of GDM but had no effect on cardiometabolic outcomes.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseDiabetes, GestationalFeasibility StudiesAdultBody CompositionEnergy IntakeFastingFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansHungerPregnancyBlood GlucoseContinuous glucose monitoringDietFemaleInsulinObesityPrevention

Identifiers

PMID39341847
PMCPMC11439041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.