ArticleEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2025
Cost-effectiveness of a novel AI technology to quantify coronary inflammation and cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing routine coronary computed tomography angiography.
Article in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Economic evaluation of AI-assisted technologies in healthcare: A systematic review.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2025Pooled it
- Application of artificial intelligence in non-invasive cardiovascular imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing the Value for Money of AI-Assisted Technologies for Older Adults: Scoping Review of Economic Evaluations.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Bibliometric Analysis of Trends and Themes.Clinical cardiology · 2026Review
- Beyond the algorithm: health technology assessment frameworks for AI in cardiology under the European Union Health Technology Assessment Regulation: a systematic review.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Silent Myocardial Infarction Revisited: Immuno-metabolic Mechanisms, Multimodal Biomarkers, and Translational Diagnostics.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Adult Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery: Real-World Deployments and Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiac CT for personalized phenotyping in stable coronary artery disease: toward precision medicine.BJR open · 2026Review
- Toward a National Health Digital and Data Architecture: Laying the Foundation for Digital Transformation: Commission on Investment Imperatives for a Healthy Nation.NAM perspectives · 2026Review
- Leveraging artificial intelligence for risk stratification of inherited cardiomyopathies in under-resourced settings.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Using pericoronary fat attenuation to guide management after coronary interventions.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Using artificial intelligence to spot heart failure from ECGs: is it prime time?European heart journal · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular imaging in 2024: review of current research and innovations.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Review
- A Promising Pathway Toward Mitigation and Eradication of Coronary Artery Disease.Cardiology research · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence for cardiology: from diagnosis to management.Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular diseaseReview
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Current Landscape, Clinical Impact, and Future Directions.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsCoronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a first-line investigation for chest pain in patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). However, many acute cardiac events occur in the absence of obstructive CAD. We assessed the lifetime cost-effectiveness of integrating a novel artificial intelligence-enhanced image analysis algorithm (AI-Risk) that stratifies the risk of cardiac events by quantifying coronary inflammation, combined with the extent of coronary artery plaque and clinical risk factors, by analysing images from routine CCTA. METHODS AND
resultsA hybrid decision-tree with population cohort Markov model was developed from 3393 consecutive patients who underwent routine CCTA for suspected obstructive CAD and followed up for major adverse cardiac events over a median (interquartile range) of 7.7(6.4-9.1) years. In a prospective real-world evaluation survey of 744 consecutive patients undergoing CCTA for chest pain investigation, the availability of AI-Risk assessment led to treatment initiation or intensification in 45% of patients. In a further prospective study of 1214 consecutive patients with extensive guidelines recommended cardiovascular risk profiling, AI-Risk stratification led to treatment initiation or intensification in 39% of patients beyond the current clinical guideline recommendations. Treatment guided by AI-Risk modelled over a lifetime horizon could lead to fewer cardiac events (relative reductions of 11%, 4%, 4%, and 12% for myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, heart failure, and cardiac death, respectively). Implementing AI-Risk Classification in routine interpretation of CCTA is highly likely to be cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio £1371-3244), both in scenarios of current guideline compliance, or when applied only to patients without obstructive CAD.
conclusionsCompared with standard care, the addition of AI-Risk assessment in routine CCTA interpretation is cost-effective, by refining risk-guided medical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.