ArticleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025
Racial differences in cardiothoracic surgery letters of recommendation.
Article in The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCardiothoracic surgery lacks racial diversity. Attracting the best candidates requires valuing diversity and advancing a recruitment process that minimizes racial bias. Implicit bias in recommendation letters has been identified as an influential mechanism for lack of diversity in cardiothoracic surgery. We aim to investigate how applicant race impacts language used in cardiothoracic surgery fellowship recommendation letters.
methodsWe examined applications to an accredited cardiothoracic surgery fellowship program between 2017 and 2021. Recommendation letter authors were categorized as cardiothoracic and noncardiothoracic surgeons. Applicant self-reported race was dichotomized as White and non-White. Applicant characteristics were described using standard descriptive statistics and compared between applicant race. Recommendation letters were examined with linguistic analysis software and higher-level analysis to assess language associations between applicant race and author specialty.
resultsA total of 597 recommendation letters were analyzed from 158 individual applications. Cardiothoracic surgeons composed 334 (55.9%) recommendation letters. A total of 95 applicants (60.1%) were categorized as White. White applicants were described as more driven (P = .03), whereas letters for non-White applicants were more authentic (P = .02) and highlighted past experiences (P = .05). Cardiothoracic surgeons wrote longer letters (P = .04) with standout adjectives (P = .03) more frequently for White applicants and emphasized perceptiveness (P = .02) more often when writing for non-White applicants.
conclusionsWe demonstrate that authors' recommendation letters are influenced by applicant race. Letters written for White candidates are significantly longer and more descriptive of drive and outstanding characteristics than letters written for non-White candidates, particularly when written by cardiothoracic surgeons. Addressing this bias is crucial for recruiting the best candidates for cardiothoracic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.