ArticleToxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA2024
Evaluation of a New In Chemico Skin Corrosion Test.
Article in Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a novel macromolecular test method for the identification of dermal corrosives. The simple in chemico test procedure involves allowing the material to be tested to interact with a skin biomarker for corrosivity and then adding a detection reagent. The corrosivity of the test substance is predicted based on the measured macromolecular damage, which results in reduced optical density of the detection reagent as compared with controls. This study aims to determine if such an extremely simple, cell-free test method can accurately identify dermal corrosives. To determine predictivity and repeatability, we tested 60 chemicals (30 in vivo dermal corrosives and 30 in vivo dermal noncorrosives; all tested in triplicate) representative of a broad range of chemical classes, functional groups, mixtures, and levels of toxicity. Validation results indicate the GHS multicategory and packing group assignment accuracy is on par with that of the Reconstructed Human Epidermis test method and the Membrane Barrier test method and for the global identification of corrosives, the method has a considerably higher accuracy (98 % vs. ∼80 %).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.