ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2024
Ocular tear fluid biomarkers collected by contact lenses.
Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Investigation Into the Collection and Isolation Workflows of Extracellular Vesicles From Tears.Journal of extracellular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo collect tear fluid biomarkers from contact lenses (CLs) and determine the impact of CL wear duration.
methodsRabbits were fitted with commercial etafilcon A CLs, which were collected after 1 min, 4 and 8 h (n = 4/time point). Tear fluid proteins and cytokines were extracted from the CLs and quantified. An exploratory comparison was performed between CLs and Schirmer Strips (SS) for a 1 min duration.
resultsThe concentration of MUC5AC was significantly higher after 4 h of CL wear. The expression of all investigated cytokines (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-8, IL-17A, IL-21, Leptin, MIP-1β, MMP-9, NCAM-1, and TNF-α) was detectable after 1 min of CL wear, and over time, all showed significant variations throughout the 8-h CL wear period. Notably, IL-1α significantly increased by 8 h of CL wear, while MMP-9 decreased. Albumin and lysozyme did not show significant variations with CL wear. Differences between CLs and SS after 1 min were statistically significant for albumin, Leptin, TNF-α, IL-1α, IL-1β, and IL-8.
conclusionsThe duration of CL wear significantly affects the collection of some tear fluid biomarkers. Albumin, MUC5AC, and cytokines may have individual and synergistic diagnostic or prognostic potential. CLs and SS were similar for lysozyme and MUC5AC but differed in the collection of albumin and some cytokines. CLs are a viable tear fluid collection method for biomarker analyses and can be immediately added as a routine clinical test by being FDA-approved medical devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.