Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39340798›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

Second-order group knockoffs with applications to genome-wide association studies.

Benjamin B Chu, Jiaqi Gu, Zhaomeng Chen, Tim Morrison, Emmanuel Candès, Zihuai He, Chiara Sabatti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin B ChuDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8342-2361
Jiaqi GuDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94035, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8773-9558
Zhaomeng ChenDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94035, USA.
Tim MorrisonDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94035, USA.
Emmanuel CandèsDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94035, USA.
Zihuai HeDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8220-4183
Chiara SabattiDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5829-9058

Funding

Stanford Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterAdmin Supp: Developing iPSC models for AD and PDP30AG066515 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Lisa Goldman Rosas · 2020 to 2026
$29.0M
POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN MEDICAL INFORMATION SCIENCEST15LM007033 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SYLVIA KATINA PLEVRITIS · 1985 to 2026
$25.5M
Statistical and computational methods for integrative analysis of Alzheimer's Disease geneticsR01AG066206 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HE, ZIHUAI · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
The pursuit of genetic causal mechanismsR56HG010812 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SABATTI, CHIARA · 2021 to 2022
$875k
NHGRI NIH HHS R56 HG010812NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066515NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066206NIH/NIA AG066206NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationConditional testing via the knockoff framework allows one to identify-among a large number of possible explanatory variables-those that carry unique information about an outcome of interest and also provides a false discovery rate guarantee on the selection. This approach is particularly well suited to the analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), which have the goal of identifying genetic variants that influence traits of medical relevance.

resultsWhile conditional testing can be both more powerful and precise than traditional GWAS analysis methods, its vanilla implementation encounters a difficulty common to all multivariate analysis methods: it is challenging to distinguish among multiple, highly correlated regressors. This impasse can be overcome by shifting the object of inference from single variables to groups of correlated variables. To achieve this, it is necessary to construct "group knockoffs." While successful examples are already documented in the literature, this paper substantially expands the set of algorithms and software for group knockoffs. We focus in particular on second-order knockoffs, for which we describe correlation matrix approximations that are appropriate for GWAS data and that result in considerable computational savings. We illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods with simulations and with the analysis of albuminuria data from the UK Biobank. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The described algorithms are implemented in an open-source Julia package Knockoffs.jl. R and Python wrappers are available as knockoffsr and knockoffspy packages.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenome-Wide Association StudySoftwareHumansPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID39340798
PMCPMC11639161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.