ArticleVeterinary research communications2024
Is microscopic agglutination test a reliable method for diagnosing the bovine genital leptospirosis syndrome?
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting genital leptospirosis in large animals: impacts on reproductive health, diagnostic challenges, and future directions.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Review
- Describing diagnosis (MAT + PCR) and control (vaccine + streptomycin sulfate) of a leptospirosis outbreak in dairy cows with reproductive disorders.Animal reproduction · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bovine Genital Leptospirosis (BGL) is a chronic reproductive syndrome characterized by genital infection by Leptospira spp. An accurate diagnosis of BGL is crucial to implementing proper control measures in field conditions. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of serology by Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT) for diagnosing leptospirosis in subfertile cows with genital infection. Of three herds, 93 non-pregnant cows with reproductive failures were submitted to the blood sampling (serology by MAT) and genital samples (lipL32-PCR). A total of 62/93 (66.6%) cows presented seroreactive to cutoff 100, while 45/93 (48.4%) cows were positive to cutoff 200, mainly against the Sejroe serogroup. In PCR analysis, 55/93 (59.1%) were positive. MAT results were compared with PCR (considered the standard), and test parameters and Cohen's kappa (ƙ) were calculated for the cut-offs 100 and 200. A ROC curve was performed for each cut-off of titers 100 to 1,600. The sensitivity and specificity of MAT100 were calculated at 66.6% and 33.3%, while for MAT200 the sensitivity was estimated as 35% and specificity as 54.5%. The accuracy of MAT was poor, being 54.8% in MAT100 and 42% in MAT200. Furthermore, the area under the curve of ROC analysis was low for all titers, and the correlation was poor for MAT100 and MAT200 (ƙ < 0). The results demonstrated that MAT is a limited technique to diagnose bovine genital carriers individually, and if only MAT is applied, genital carriers may pass undetected, impairing the control programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39340735What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.