ArticleExperimental brain research2024
Eyes and hand are both reliable at localizing somatosensory targets.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Body representations (BR) for action are critical to perform accurate movements. Yet, behavioral measures suggest that BR are distorted even in healthy people. However, the upper limb has mostly been used as a probe so far, making difficult to decide whether BR are truly distorted or whether this depends on the effector used as a readout. Here, we aimed to assess in healthy humans the accuracy of the eye and hand effectors in localizing somatosensory targets, to determine whether they may probe BR similarly. Twenty-six participants completed two localization tasks in which they had to localize an unseen target (proprioceptive or tactile) with either their eyes or hand. Linear mixed model revealed in both tasks a larger horizontal (but not vertical) localization error for the ocular than for the manual localization performance. However, despite better hand mean accuracy, manual and ocular localization performance positively correlated to each other in both tasks. Moreover, target position also affected localization performance for both eye and hand responses: accuracy was higher for the more flexed position of the elbow in the proprioceptive task and for the thumb than for the index finger in the tactile task, thus confirming previous results of better performance for the thumb. These findings indicate that the hand seems to beat the eyes along the horizontal axis when localizing somatosensory targets, but the localization patterns revealed by the two effectors seemed to be related and characterized by the same target effect, opening the way to assess BR with the eyes when upper limb motor control is disturbed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39340566What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.