Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39340566›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2024

Eyes and hand are both reliable at localizing somatosensory targets.

Marion Naffrechoux, Eric Koun, Frederic Volland, Alessandro Farnè, Alice Catherine Roy, Denis Pélisson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marion NaffrechouxIntegrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team of the Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028 CNRS U5292 University Lyon 1, 16 avenue du Doyen Lépine, Lyon, 69500, France. m.naffrechoux@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6022-4749
Eric KounIntegrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team of the Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028 CNRS U5292 University Lyon 1, 16 avenue du Doyen Lépine, Lyon, 69500, France.
Frederic VollandIntegrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team of the Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028 CNRS U5292 University Lyon 1, 16 avenue du Doyen Lépine, Lyon, 69500, France.
Alessandro Farnè *Integrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team of the Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028 CNRS U5292 University Lyon 1, 16 avenue du Doyen Lépine, Lyon, 69500, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5769-3491
Alice Catherine Roy *Laboratoire Dynamique Du Langage CNRS, UMR 5596 University Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
Denis Pélisson *Integrative Multisensory Perception Action and Cognition Team of the Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028 CNRS U5292 University Lyon 1, 16 avenue du Doyen Lépine, Lyon, 69500, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9114-7758

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-CE28-0015Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-22-CE28-0018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body representations (BR) for action are critical to perform accurate movements. Yet, behavioral measures suggest that BR are distorted even in healthy people. However, the upper limb has mostly been used as a probe so far, making difficult to decide whether BR are truly distorted or whether this depends on the effector used as a readout. Here, we aimed to assess in healthy humans the accuracy of the eye and hand effectors in localizing somatosensory targets, to determine whether they may probe BR similarly. Twenty-six participants completed two localization tasks in which they had to localize an unseen target (proprioceptive or tactile) with either their eyes or hand. Linear mixed model revealed in both tasks a larger horizontal (but not vertical) localization error for the ocular than for the manual localization performance. However, despite better hand mean accuracy, manual and ocular localization performance positively correlated to each other in both tasks. Moreover, target position also affected localization performance for both eye and hand responses: accuracy was higher for the more flexed position of the elbow in the proprioceptive task and for the thumb than for the index finger in the tactile task, thus confirming previous results of better performance for the thumb. These findings indicate that the hand seems to beat the eyes along the horizontal axis when localizing somatosensory targets, but the localization patterns revealed by the two effectors seemed to be related and characterized by the same target effect, opening the way to assess BR with the eyes when upper limb motor control is disturbed.

Indexed as

HandProprioceptionTouch PerceptionAdultEyeFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionYoung AdultBody representationsManual pointingProprioceptionSaccadesTactile perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.