Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39340547›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024

Systematic development of a patient-reported ONCOlogical-ROUTinE-Screening (ONCO-ROUTES) procedure at the University Cancer Center Regensburg.

Julia Maurer, Anna Saibold, Katharina Gerl, Michael Koller, Oliver Koelbl, Tobias Pukrop, Sandra Windschuettl, Sabine Einhell, Anne Herrmann-Johns, Georgios Raptis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julia MaurerUniversity Cancer Center Regensburg, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. julia.maurer@ukr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5340-2793
Anna SaiboldBavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Regensburg, Germany.
Katharina GerleHealth Laboratory, OTH Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Michael KollerCenter for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Oliver KoelblDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Tobias PukropBavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Regensburg, Germany.
Sandra WindschuettlBavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Regensburg, Germany.
Sabine EinhellDepartment of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Anne Herrmann-JohnsBavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Regensburg, Germany.
Georgios RaptiseHealth Laboratory, OTH Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Karolina MuellerCenter for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe evaluation of treatment success and progression in oncology patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is playing an increasingly important role. Meanwhile, PROs are a component of the certification requirements of the German Cancer Society for oncology centers. PROs are used to provide supportive therapy. There is currently no instrument that fully covers the requirements. At the University Hospital Regensburg (UKR), a digital ONCOlogical-ROUTinE-Screening (ONCO-ROUTES) procedure was developed in order to assess the need for supportive therapy in a standardized way and to provide patients with supportive interventions tailored to their needs.

methodsOn the basis of current requirements and guidelines, the development of ONCO-ROUTES was supported by experts in focus groups and interviews, and digitalization was carried out in connection with the IT infrastructure.

resultsA Needs-based, Quality-of-life (QoL) and Symptoms Screening (NQS

conclusionThe digital PRO application ONCO-ROUTES is designed to involve patients in monitoring additional supportive needs and thus, improves supportive interdisciplinary treatment.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeGermanyHumansMass ScreeningSurveys and QuestionnairesDigitalizationInteroperabilityPatient-reported outcomes (PROs)Routine screeningSupportive therapy

Identifiers

PMID39340547
PMCPMC11438834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.