Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39340403›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Fecal microbiota of diarrheic calves: Before, during, and after recovering from disease.

Emma Jessop, David L Renaud, Adronie Verbrugghe, Dasiel Obregon, Jenniffer Macnicol, Aoife McMahon, Lynna Li, Lisa Gamsjäger, Diego E Gomez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emma JessopDepartment of Clinical Studies, University of Guelph, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
David L RenaudDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Adronie VerbruggheDepartment of Clinical Studies, University of Guelph, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8151-5844
Dasiel ObregonSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Jenniffer MacnicolDepartment of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Aoife McMahonDepartment of Clinical Studies, University of Guelph, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Lynna LiDepartment of Clinical Studies, University of Guelph, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa GamsjägerDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9645-2583
Diego E GomezDepartment of Clinical Studies, University of Guelph, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7495-4868

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is unknown if gastrointestinal dysbiosis in diarrheic calves causes disease or is a consequence of the disease.

objectivesDescribe the fecal microbiota of calves before, during, and after recovering from diarrhea. ANIMALS: Fifteen female Holstein calves of 0 to 21 days old from a single farm. Seven calves remained healthy throughout the study, and 8 developed diarrhea on Day 14.

methodsLongitudinal cohort study. Microbiota composition was characterized by amplifying the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene.

resultsDiversity (Shannon index) increased with age in healthy and diarrheic calves from Day 3 to 21, but diarrheic calves had a lower diversity on the day diarrhea was first observed (Day 14). By Day 21, diversity increased in calves that recovered from diarrhea and was not significantly different from that of their healthy counterparts (P > .05). Weighted UniFrac distance showed significant differences in the fecal microbiota between diarrheic and healthy calves at Day 14 of age (PERMANOVA, P < .05), but not before or after diarrhea (PERMANOVA, P > .05). Lactobacillus, Clostridium Sensu Stricto 1, and Collinsella were differentially abundant on Day 10 in calves that developed diarrhea on Day 14 (P < .05). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The fecal microbiota of healthy and diarrheic calves evolved similarly during the first 10 days of age but differed significantly on the day of onset of diarrhea. Enriching Lactobacillus, Clostridium Sensu Stricto 1, and Collinsella before diarrhea onset could have been contributed to the development of diarrhea.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesDiarrheaFecesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnimalsAnimals, NewbornCattleCohort StudiesDysbiosisFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLongitudinal StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbovine healthClostridium Sensu StrictoCollinseladysbiosisgastrointestinal tractLactobacillus

Identifiers

PMID39340403
PMCPMC11586557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.