ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Lymph node ratio as an indicator of nodal status in the assessment of survival and recurrence in vulvar cancer: A cohort study.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Factors and Quality of Life in Vulvar Cancer Patients: 12-Year Results from a Eastern European Center.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Inhibition of Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) by Tiplaxtinin Attenuates the Aggressive Phenotype of Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma CellsIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInguinal lymph node (LN) metastasis and particularly the number of metastatic lymph nodes (NMLN) represent a determinant prognostic factor in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). However, the NMLN may be related to the number of removed LNs. Therefore, the lymph node ratio (LNR) reflects not only the burden of LN involvement but also the quality and extent of lymphadenectomy.
objectivesTo investigate the value of the LNR and the count of LN on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).
designThis study is a retrospective, longitudinal, institution-based study.
methodsThis study included 192 patients treated for VSCC at the Salah Azaiez Institute between 1994 and 2022. Clinical, pathological, and evolutionary data were reported. Survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and predictive factors of outcome were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsSurgery consisted of a radical vulvectomy, hemivulvectomy, and pelvic exenteration in, respectively, 96.4%, 2.1%, and 1.6% of cases followed by adjuvant radiotherapy in 38.5% of cases. LN dissection was bilateral in 88.5% of cases. LNR = 0, LNR = 0-0.2, and LNR ⩾0.2 were recorded in, respectively, 64.7%, 22.1%, and 13.2% of cases. With a mean follow-up time of 35 ± 42.06 months, the 5-year OS was 52.5% and the 5-year RFS was 55.8%. On multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors of OS were the LNR (hazard ratio (HR) = 5.702; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.282-14.245;
conclusionSurgical margin, FIGO stage, and LNR represent the independent prognostic factors of survival and LNR showed superior prognostic predictive accuracy compared with the revised 2021 FIGO staging system for predicting OS and RFS in VSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.