Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39340297›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Impact of Contextual Factors on the Perceived Participation of People With Multiple Sclerosis and Gait Impairment Using Mobility Assistive Devices: A Qualitative Analysis.

Elise-Marie Dilger, Nadja Reeck, Dyon Hoekstra, Annett Thiele, Anna Levke Brütt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Making Room for Every Voice: Reimagining Person-Centred Care in the Neurosciences.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elise-Marie DilgerJunior Research Group for Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2740-1157
Nadja ReeckJunior Research Group for Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1856-7801
Dyon HoekstraResearch Group for Education and Didactics in Chronic and Progressive Diseases and Physical Disabilities, Department of Special Needs Education and Rehabilitation, School of Educational and Social Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0677-2063
Annett ThieleResearch Group for Education and Didactics in Chronic and Progressive Diseases and Physical Disabilities, Department of Special Needs Education and Rehabilitation, School of Educational and Social Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6645-4388
Anna Levke BrüttJunior Research Group for Rehabilitation Sciences, Department of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4197-6048

Funding

This study was supported by the German Federal Joint Committee's Innovation Fund (Grant 01VSF19046). The Junior Research Group for Rehabilitation Sciences received funding from the Deutsche Rentenversicherung Oldenburg-Bremen (German pension insurance Oldenburg-Bremen).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople with multiple sclerosis and gait impairment are particularly susceptible to facing restrictions in their participation. This study aims to investigate (a) which contextual factors within the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) are relevant for participation from the perspective of people with multiple sclerosis and gait impairment who (intend to) use mobility assistive devices, and (b) how these contextual factors shape the subjective facets of participation, including a sense of connection, efficacy and meaning, based on the social identity approach to health and well-being.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative analysis on data gathered from four online focus group interviews, each involving four to six people with multiple sclerosis and gait impairment who (intend to) use mobility assistive devices (totalling N = 19), and 12 individual online interviews conducted with participants from the focus group interviews. The analysis followed the qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz.

resultsMobility assistive devices such as walkers, manual wheelchairs and electric wheelchairs/scooters were seen as facilitators that enabled participation in various life situations and enhanced a sense of efficacy by promoting independence. Challenges were encountered in relation to architectural barriers, pathways, weather conditions, public transportation and the lack of integral accessibility to services and systems. Although instrumental support could ease participation, it was also associated with an impaired sense of efficacy. Attitudes, particularly developing an understanding of the experiences of people with multiple sclerosis and gait impairment from others' perspectives, were considered important but often lacking, and discriminatory attitudes were experienced. On the level of personal factors, acceptance of both the mobility assistive devices and the disease itself were seen as facilitators for maintaining involvement in life situations.

conclusionsThis study extends the existing literature by shedding light on the interconnectedness of contextual factors within the ICF and various facets of perceived participation, including a sense of connection, efficacy and meaning. These findings provide valuable insights for stakeholders such as urban planners and policymakers in developing inclusive environments that enhance the overall quality of participation for people with multiple sclerosis and gait impairment. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study reports on the lived experiences of people with multiple sclerosis and gait impairment who (intend to) use mobility assistive devices. The research team stood in close exchange with project members of the German Multiple Sclerosis Society Lower Saxony, a group representing the interests of people with multiple sclerosis, to design and conduct the focus group interviews. The results from the focus group interviews were the basis for the design of a participatory future workshop in which people with multiple sclerosis and stakeholders involved in the healthcare process collaboratively developed recommendations for improving the provision of mobility assistive devices.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register number: DRKS00025532.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsMultiple SclerosisQualitative ResearchSelf-Help DevicesAdultAgedFemaleGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobility LimitationPersons with Disabilitiesgait impairmentinclusionmobility assistive devicemultiple sclerosisparticipationqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39340297
PMCPMC11437357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.