Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39340274›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease

Quantifying the ‘distance to LDL-C goal’ in patients at very high cardiovascular risk with hyperlipidaemia in Germany: a retrospective claims database analysis.

Ksenija Stach, Hartmut Richter, Uwe Fraass, Alexandra Stein

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ksenija Stach5th Medical Department, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim 68167, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9151-7659
Hartmut RichterIQVIA Epidemiology, IQVIA, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Uwe FraassAmgen GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Alexandra SteinAmgen GmbH, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThis study quantified the 'distance to LDL-C goal' in patients at very high cardiovascular risk with uncontrolled hyperlipidaemia. 'Distance to LDL-C goal' was defined as the percentage by which low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels needed to be reduced to achieve the LDL-C goals specified in the 2016 or 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines. DESIGN AND

methodsThis retrospective analysis using data from the IQVIA Disease Analyzer database included patients who were predominantly treated by a primary care physician, diabetologist or cardiologist between 2014 and 2018, with a diagnosis of hyperlipidaemia and an initial LDL-C measurement (index event) and one or more cardiovascular risk factors. The primary outcome was to assess the proportion of patients with uncontrolled hyperlipidaemia and to classify the 'distance to LDL-C goal' in these patients.

resultsData from 32,963 patients were analysed (

conclusionLDL-C levels were uncontrolled in most patients with hyperlipidaemia. Analysis of the 'distance to LDL-C goal' showed that most patients required a substantial LDL-C level reduction to achieve their LDL-C goal.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLDatabases, FactualHeart Disease Risk FactorsHyperlipidemiasAdministrative Claims, HealthcareAgedFemaleGermanyHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentBiomarkersCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorscardiovascular riskLDL-C goalsLDL-C reductionLDL-C targetlipid-lowering therapylow-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Identifiers

PMID39340274
PMCPMC11440620

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.