ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025
Need for specially designed educational support groups: Young women's experiences of being identified with BRCA pathogenic variants.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- "A Much Needed Specialist Service": Patient Perspectives on Hereditary Cancer Risk Psychology Service Delivery and Future Service Development.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Motherhood with HBOC in Israel: experiencing preventive disruption.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Need for specially designed educational support groups: Young women's experiences of being identified with BRCA pathogenic variants.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- From genetic risk to early detection - clinical outcomes of a person-centered screening program for women with a high genetic risk of breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Norway, genetic testing is permitted from the age of 16, and females identified with pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes (BRCA PVs) can manage their cancer risk through screening programs and/or by undergoing risk-reducing surgery from the age of 25 years'. This qualitative study aimed to explore and describe how women under the age of 25 years' experience the genetic counseling and testing process for BRCA PVs and living with an increased cancer risk. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with five women with BRCA PVs. Thematic cross-case data analysis with systematic text condensation was used. Three main themes were identified: (1) experience with genetic counseling and testing, (2) impact of pathogenic variants on participants' future, and (3) social and psychological support needs. Women perceive genetic counseling as a source of information and care. The decision for genetic testing was made autonomously, both in line with and conflicting with the parents' wishes. Living with genetic risk adds a layer of worry and pressure regarding future decisions. Many experienced loneliness owing to a lack of contact with other young women with BRCA PVs. The results of this study indicate the need for better support after genetic testing, such as the need for educational support groups specially designed for these young women and a meeting place with their peers. Genetic counselors need to emphasize the opportunity for follow-up counseling and give assistance to choose suitable psychologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.