Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39340146›Full record

ArticlePest management science2025

Dynamic movement patterns of commensal rodents Mastomys natalensis and Rattus rattus: determining differential habitat use using Rhodamine B.

Herieth Mkomwa, Rhodes Makundi, Steven Belmain, Alfan A Rija, Apia Massawe, Aurore Ponchon, Mwajabu Selemani, Marcela P A Espinaze, Sandra Telfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pest management science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Herieth MkomwaDepartment of Wildlife Management, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Rhodes MakundiAfrican Centre of Excellence for Innovative Rodent Pest Management and Biosensor Technology Development, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4672-2354
Steven BelmainNatural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Kent, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5590-7545
Alfan A RijaDepartment of Wildlife Management, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7386-8124
Apia MassaweAfrican Centre of Excellence for Innovative Rodent Pest Management and Biosensor Technology Development, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Aurore PonchonSchool of Biological Sciences, Zoology Building, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Mwajabu SelemaniAfrican Centre of Excellence for Innovative Rodent Pest Management and Biosensor Technology Development, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Marcela P A EspinazeSchool of Biological Sciences, Zoology Building, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0809-4403
Sandra TelferSchool of Biological Sciences, Zoology Building, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9596-0711

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care ResearchUK Research and InnovationWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding movement patterns of rodent pests is essential for planning management strategies. Currently, for many rural village contexts, there is limited information on how rodents move between domestic and peridomestic areas, and the surrounding habitats. We investigated movement of the multimammate rat, Mastomys natalensis and the black rat, Rattus rattus in nine villages in Kilombero District, Tanzania. We used Rhodamine B (RhB) baits placed inside houses (R. rattus preferred habitat) in five villages and placed outside (M. natalensis preferred habitat) in four villages.

resultsWhilst both species were rarely captured in their nonpreferred habitat (5% M. natalensis inside houses; 23% R. rattus outside houses), evidence of RhB consumption when bait was in nonpreferred habitat was high for both species (50% M. natalensis; 57% R. rattus), indicating frequent movement to nonpreferred habitats. Whilst R. rattus movement distances were consistent with previous studies (maximum 81 m), within our village context, M. natalensis moved further (maximum 132 m) compared to previous published studies. Although bait consumption rates varied seasonally, we found no evidence that utilization of nonpreferred habitat varied seasonally. M. natalensis females moved into houses more frequently than males, whilst immature R. rattus moved outside houses more than mature individuals.

conclusionThese findings highlight the dynamic movement patterns of commensal rodents with implications for control and disease transmission. © 2024 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

EcosystemMurinaeRhodaminesAnimal DistributionAnimalsFemaleMaleRatsRodent ControlSeasonsTanzaniarhodamine BRhodaminesconsumption rate and Tanzaniahabitat preferenceMastomys natalensisPest rodentsRattus rattus

Identifiers

PMID39340146
PMCPMC11632208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.