Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39340072›Full record

ArticleVaccines2024

Post-Pandemic Maternity Care Planning for Vaccination: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Women, Partners, Health Care Professionals, and Policy Makers in the United Kingdom.

Tisha Dasgupta, Harriet Boulding, Abigail Easter, Tania Sutedja, Asma Khalil, Hiten D Mistry, Gillian Horgan, Aricca D Van Citters, Eugene C Nelson, Peter von Dadelszen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Acceptance of the COVID-19 Vaccine Among Postpartum Women in Five Countries.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tisha DasguptaDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7874-9519
Harriet BouldingThe Policy Institute, Faculty of Social Science & Public Policy, King's College London, London WC2B 6LE, UK.
Abigail EasterDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK.
Tania SutedjaThe RESILIENT Study Patient & Public Involvement & Engagement Advisory Group, UK.
Asma KhalilFetal Medicine Unit, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2802-7670
Hiten D MistryDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2564-7348
Gillian HorganDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK.
Aricca D Van CittersThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03756, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2961-5661
Eugene C NelsonThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03756, USA.
Peter von DadelszenDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4136-3070
Emma L DuncanDepartment of Twin Research & Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8143-4403
The Resilient Study GroupThe RESILIENT Study Group, UK.
Sergio A SilverioDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7177-3471
Laura A MageeDepartment of Women & Children's Health, School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1355-610X

Funding

Economic & Social Research Council ES/P00703/1National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR134293National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR-INF-2170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal vaccination during pregnancy, in general and against COVID-19 infection, offers protection to both mother and baby, but uptake remains suboptimal. This study aimed to explore the perceptions regarding COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, particularly for marginalised populations and those living with social or medical complexity. A total of 96 semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 40 women, 15 partners, 21 HCPs, and 20 policy makers, across all four nations of the United Kingdom (UK), discussing their lived experience of utilising, delivering, or developing policy for COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy during the pandemic. Three themes were derived: (1) historical and social context, (2) communication of information and guidance, and (3) appraisal and action. Together these captured the participants' legacy of mistrust in drugs during pregnancy; prior positive experiences; concerns about missing information, conflicting information, or false information about COVID-19 vaccines; and confusing guidance for pregnant women. The final theme describes the participants' behaviour and actions undertaken consequent to their experiences and the available information. The findings suggest efforts to improve COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy may be best focused on personalised communication of information. A trusting relationship and prior positive experiences with other vaccines, both in and outside of pregnancy, positively influenced perceptions of COVID-19 vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19healthcare professionalsmaternity carepartnerspolicy makersqualitative researchvaccinationwomenwomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID39340072
PMCPMC11436220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.