Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39340051›Full record

ReviewVaccines2024

Immunity to Varicella Zoster Virus in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024).

Matteo Riccò, Pietro Ferraro, Salvatore Zaffina, Vincenzo Camisa, Federico Marchesi, Francesca Fortin Franzoso, Cosimo Ligori, Daniel Fiacchini, Nicola Magnavita, Silvio Tafuri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matteo RiccòServizio di Prevenzione e Sicurezza Negli Ambienti di Lavoro (SPSAL), AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Via Amendola n.2, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6525-2159
Pietro FerraroOccupational Medicine Unit, Direzione Sanità, Italian Railways' Infrastructure Division, RFI SpA, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9149-1647
Salvatore ZaffinaOccupational Medicine Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8858-5423
Vincenzo CamisaOccupational Medicine Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Federico MarchesiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci, 14, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Francesca Fortin FranzosoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci, 14, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Cosimo LigoriDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci, 14, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Daniel FiacchiniAST Ancona, Prevention Department, UOC Sorveglianza e Prevenzione Malattie Infettive e Cronico Degenerative, 60127 Ancona, Italy.
Nicola MagnavitaPost-Graduate School of Occupational Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0988-7344
Silvio TafuriDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4194-0210

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are occupationally exposed to varicella zoster virus (VZV), and their inappropriate vaccination status could contribute to an outbreak involving both professionals and the patients they care for, with a potential impact on the general population. Therefore, since 2007, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that all HCWs have evidence of immunity against varicella. The present meta-analysis was therefore designed to collect the available evidence on the seronegative status of VZV among HCWs. PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched without backward limit for articles reporting on the seroprevalence of VZV among HCWs, and all articles meeting the inclusion criteria were included in a random-effect meta-analysis model. From 1744 initial entries, a total of 58 articles were included in the quantitative analysis (publication range: 1988 to 2024), for a pooled sample of 71,720 HCWs. Moreover, the included studies reported on seroprevalence data on measles (N = 36,043 HCWs) and rubella (N = 22,086 HCWs). Eventually, the pooled seronegative status for VZV was estimated to be 5.72% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 4.59 to 7.10) compared to 6.91% (95% CI 4.79 to 9.87) for measles and 7.21% (5.36 to 9.64) for rubella, with a greater risk among subjects younger than 30 years at the time of the survey (risk ratio [RR] 1.434, 95% CI 1.172 to 1.756). Interestingly, medical history of either VZV infection/vaccination had low diagnostic performances (sensitivity 76.00%; specificity 60.12%; PPV of 96.12% but PNV of 18.64%). In summary, the available data suggest that newly hired HCWs are increasingly affected by low immunization rates for VZV but also for measles and rubella, stressing the importance of systematically testing test newly hired workers for all components of the measles-pertussis-rubella-varicella vaccine.

Indexed as

chickenpoxhealthcare workersshinglesvaricella zostervaricella zoster vaccine

Identifiers

PMID39340051
PMCPMC11436139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.