ArticleViruses2024
Next-Generation Sequencing Reveals a High Frequency of HIV-1 Minority Variants and an Expanded Drug Resistance Profile among Individuals on First-Line ART.
Article in Viruses, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- High frequency of HIV-1 drug resistance among individuals with persistent low-level viremia during first-line antiretroviral therapy in Uganda.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Analysis of temporal virus evolution and intra-host diversity in long-term non-progressors by bulk next-generation sequencing.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Detection of HIV-1 Resistance Mutations to Antiretroviral Therapy and Cell Tropism in Russian Patients Using Next-Generation Sequencing.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- HIV-1 drug resistance among pregnant and breastfeeding mothers and its association with paediatric HIV infections in the Dolutegravir era in Uganda.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We assessed the performance and clinical relevance of Illumina MiSeq next-generation sequencing (NGS) for HIV-1 genotyping compared with Sanger sequencing (SS). We analyzed 167 participants, 45 with virologic failure (VL ≥ 1000 copies/mL), i.e., cases, and 122 time-matched participants with virologic suppression (VL < 1000 copies/mL), i.e., controls, 12 months post-ART initiation. Major surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRMs) detected by SS were all detectable by NGS. Among cases at 12 months, SS identified SDRMs in 32/45 (71.1%) while NGS identified SDRMs among 35/45 (77.8%), increasing the number of cases with SDRMs by 3/45 (6.7%). Participants identified with, and proportions of major SDRMs increased when NGS was used. NGS vs. SS at endpoint revealed for NNRTIs: 36/45 vs. 33/45; Y181C: 26/45 vs. 24/45; K103N: 9/45 vs. 6/45 participants with SDRMs, respectively. At baseline, NGS revealed major SDRMs in 9/45 (20%) cases without SDRMs by SS. Participant MBL/043, among the nine, the following major SDRMs existed: L90M to PIs, K65R and M184V to NRTIs, and Y181C and K103N to NNRTIs. The SDRMs among the nine increased SDRMs to NRTIs, NNRTIs, and PIs. Only 43/122 (25.7%) of participants had pre-treatment minority SDRMs. Also, 24.4% of the cases vs. 26.2 of controls had minority SDRMs (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.